Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Eric, yes, the gun looks like what it says on the box and the price seems fair. Interesting that the owner has been firing it with real shot, so he should know it inside and out.

 

Just one word of warning, though. He says it has passed inspection. You'd need to get a firm guarantee from him that this gun is still safe to use, unless you simply want it for your collection or for decoration. From the pics the only question I would have is about the pitting near the muzzle (in the fuzzy shot?) and the condition of the pan. From the side shot there, the pan looks pitted. I would want to see inside with the pan-lid open before any possible purchase.

 

Thanks for the link.

Posted
  pcfarrar said:
I don't know a great deal about Tanegashima but I recently saw a nice looking one on Gunstar:

 

http://www.gunstar.co.uk/Antique-Musket ... 35546.aspx

 

Funny how the spring is described as made of brass, so "rather weak". :lol: They are designed to be weak. The spring's only function is to gently help lock the serpentine in the up position, and with release of the trigger to drop the match onto the pan. Too much strength and it would put the match out as it fell.

 

A matchlock does not need to hit metal and strike sparks, so that strong spring that you find in a flintlock or a percussion lock is unnecessary.

 

(Having said that, you can have problems inside the lock mechanism which may be preventing the Hibasami serpentine from falling freely.)

Posted

Both nice examples of whats available for sale outside of Japan, I remember Brian and at least one other forum member mentioning that they were possibly looking to purchase one eventually.

Posted

Yep..I would love to own a nice one. But unless someone is feeling particularly generous or in a great discount mood, :( it isn't going to happen anytime soon. Things are tight nowdays..I guess for everyone.

Still, they remain on the bucket list to acquire oneday. For us firearms and Samurai enthusiasts, they have double interest.

 

Brian

Posted
  Brian said:
The Krank one looks very shortened to me. Opinions?

 

Brian

 

Yes, Brian, you may well be right. I have seen several examples of barrels and stocks that have been cut down, this for a number of reasons, where the end of the stock is broken or rotted for example. Much easier to saw off a section of barrel, move the front sight back and reshape the stock. Then the paperwork needs to be reissued, which is not easy. It is strictly illegal to do this in Japan, but nevertheless it happens. That photo seems to show such work.

 

No idea what 'oval bore' is supposed to mean. And these guns are often described as having cherrywood stocks when that is quite unlikely unless they have been rebuilt in the west. Aka-gashi or Red oak was the usual wood used for pole arms, gun stocks etc.

 

By the same token there are are many short guns which are/were favoured by smaller soldiers. Short overall versions of early Enfields for example were quickly produced for Japan's new army in early Meiji.

 

One of the surprising things about Tanegashima is the almost complete absence of standardization and the huge variety in size, shape and appearance.

Posted

Thanks, Eric. The price points are useful. Albeit as reference only as the irs wont get off my back about 2009. A good year that has since soured, but that is a story for another day.

 

Regards

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...