Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

Looking for any details, info, comments or pics of hira zukuri katana. How common are they, and were they predominantly a Shinshinto thing, Koto or all eras?

I'll post pics of the one I picked up in a day or 2. Must say, quite attractive and I guess a little unusual.

 

Brian

Posted

Brian,

 

Yes, they are nice. It is my believe that they were more common in the kotou era.

 

Here is my specimen:

 

平鎮教 二代

SHIZUNORI – Bungo 1558

 

Enjoy!

 

I'm looking forward seeing your pics Brian.

 

/Martin

  • Like 1
Posted

Brian, I had an uchigatana in hira zukuri that I traded a number of years ago (before I realized how rare it was) to a local dealer (who will remain unnamed) that had NTHK papers indicating it was koto. I've pulled a mental blank on who the smith was, & no longer work with that dealer, so I can't ask him.

 

Ken

Posted

Hi

One of my favorite styles :clap: Posted is my very large hirazukuri, mei is Soshu ju Tsunahiro. 27" nagasa, 35mm motohaba, 7.5mm motokasane.

 

Kam

post-2958-1419681420793_thumb.jpg

post-2958-14196814208793_thumb.jpg

post-2958-14196814209516_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

There were not that unusual in Bizen Den, in the end of Nambokucho. There were at Aoi Art a few years ago 2/3 Katana for sale, now off to Japan. :D

Posted

Believe it or not "made to use" hira zukuri katana are also more recent...I have seen a WWII gendaito in Type 98 mounts with this blade. It was made by Yanagawa Ushoshin (also Seishoshin) and the mei can be seen here http://home.earthlink.net/~ttstein/seisho.jpg I can't remember exactly now but it may be tachi-mei.

I know nothing about him other than he is listed in the Gendai Swordsmiths list linked above under "Special Ranks - Betseki".

Sorry I have no pic, but this may be one of the swords my friend recently lost in a break-in.

Regards,

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks guys, keep them coming.

In my case, what I have is an obvious gimei Muramasa. It doesn't have enough age to be Muramasa. But someone certainly went to a lot of trouble to fake Muramasa, as it has a lot of traits. Hamon comes close to the ha in places (not worn through polishing though) and although not 100% identical, you can see the smith tried to make the hamon similar each side. Lovely hamon, which pops in the right light. A little tobiyaki/muneyaki in places. Just generally a pleasing sword.

But what interests me most is the hira zukuri. Someone obviously forged this blade to begin with to emulate this school. I need to add that they slipped up with the nakago, as they didn't quite get the shape right. Almost...but altered I suspect.

Not sure whether this started out as a sword that was then later gimei'd...or as I suspect..made as an utsushimono that was later signed.

It has part Gunto fittings, part old fittings. Went to war. Maybe a Shinshinto? No flaws, and the hada is so tight that it isn't very visible in the current polish.

Whatever it is, I think it is unusual and quite like it. I only have the pics I was first sent. Will try post better ones this weekend.

 

Brian

DSC_1.jpg

DSC_321.JPG

DSC_0326.JPG

DSC_0383.JPG

DSC_341.JPG

DSC_319.JPG

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I was told that a well-known smith, who likes making them, has problems selling them because they are prone to cracking - even a considerable time after being made.

Ian Bottomley

  • Like 1
  • 9 years later...
Posted
On 10/25/2011 at 12:37 PM, Brian said:

Thanks guys, keep them coming.

In my case, what I have is an obvious gimei Muramasa. It doesn't have enough age to be Muramasa. But someone certainly went to a lot of trouble to fake Muramasa, as it has a lot of traits. Hamon comes close to the ha in places (not worn through polishing though) and although not 100% identical, you can see the smith tried to make the hamon similar each side. Lovely hamon, which pops in the right light. A little tobiyaki/muneyaki in places. Just generally a pleasing sword.

But what interests me most is the hira zukuri. Someone obviously forged this blade to begin with to emulate this school. I need to add that they slipped up with the nakago, as they didn't quite get the shape right. Almost...but altered I suspect.

Not sure whether this started out as a sword that was then later gimei'd...or as I suspect..made as an utsushimono that was later signed.

It has part Gunto fittings, part old fittings. Went to war. Maybe a Shinshinto? No flaws, and the hada is so tight that it isn't very visible in the current polish.

Whatever it is, I think it is unusual and quite like it. I only have the pics I was first sent. Will try post better ones this weekend.

 

Brian

DSC_1.jpg

DSC_321.JPG

DSC_0326.JPG

DSC_0383.JPG

DSC_341.JPG

DSC_319.JPG

Has a large pitted on blade pitted  spot 

The rest looks nice 

steve 

 

 

 

Posted

I once discussed this with Yoshindo Yoshihara who likes making them, but he said they have a tendency to develop hagiri, sometimes long after having been made. 

Ian Bottomley

 

  • Like 1
  • Wow 1
Posted

The reason for HAGIRE is due to the thinner cutting edge. In modern knives we call this the primary bevel (or grind angle). This feature eliminates some weight from the blade, making it a good but sensitive cutter for 'soft' targets.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have a wakizashi of this form, posted elsewhere here. The katana seem to be a specialist blade, apparently favoured for competitive test cutting nowadays.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...