Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

good day all...

I'm a new member in this board. I'd like to ask for your opinion.

I have these sword since 6 months ago.mumei sword. I'm an Indonesian, found this sword in an antique store in Indonesia...is it a nihonto or else???

any information would be great.

regards,

ferry

post-332-14196736536036_thumb.jpg

post-332-14196736539708_thumb.jpg

post-332-14196736542773_thumb.jpg

post-332-14196736545331_thumb.jpg

Posted

At 1st glance it looks real but looking again I wonder about the placement of the 3 mekugi-ana in the nakago. They're too close to the ha; to my eyes an unnatural placement.

Still could be OK, though. Hard to tell for sure with the little I can see in the pictures.

Anyone else care to chime in?

Grey

Posted

I agree with Grey. Looks too well done to be a fake. I would take a shot at genuine, and messed with a bit.

If I look at those 2 smaller ana (holes) in the nakago, they give me the impression that they were added later...maybe to mount non-traditional slab sided grips? I would think the larger one is the original one.

Still..the shape and file marks look ok. I think it is worth looking into, as it is probably genuine (in my humble opinion)

Can't say if it is just a machine made blade or slightly older though. What did the fittings look like, or did you get it this way? I would be interested in knowing what handle they used.

 

Regards,

Brian

Posted

The dimension and placement of the two smaller holes is the thing that puzzle me. I've suggested to the owner they were made for a Shingunto

mounting, being the last one in the same position of the Sarute, but it

doesn't work... :?

Otherwise I would have put my money on an old sword abused by a non-traditional polishing. I would like to see BOTH faces of the sword and what's under the Habaki.

Posted
I agree with Grey. Looks too well done to be a fake. I would take a shot at genuine, and messed with a bit.

If I look at those 2 smaller ana (holes) in the nakago, they give me the impression that they were added later...maybe to mount non-traditional slab sided grips? I would think the larger one is the original one.

Still..the shape and file marks look ok. I think it is worth looking into, as it is probably genuine (in my humble opinion)

Can't say if it is just a machine made blade or slightly older though. What did the fittings look like, or did you get it this way? I would be interested in knowing what handle they used.

 

Regards,

Brian

 

I cant find the fittings.

but I know it was mounted in wood saya covered with brown leather, cant find the fittings. it might been sold to other person.

Posted

Hi Ferry, I'm based in Jakarta. If you're based here too, I'd be happy to help you determine what the sword actually. I have a very limited knowledge of Nihonto, it's a subject that gets more complex the deeper you get into it! (I should have stuck with Juke boxes, a much easier subject.) Anyway email me and perhaps I can help.

 

John b

Posted
Hi Ferry, I'm based in Jakarta. If you're based here too, I'd be happy to help you determine what the sword actually. I have a very limited knowledge of Nihonto, it's a subject that gets more complex the deeper you get into it! (I should have stuck with Juke boxes, a much easier subject.) Anyway email me and perhaps I can help.

 

John b

 

Hi Johnb, I'm based in Jakarta too.

west Jakarta , Have you ever look at the antique market in surabaya street?

I used to look for swords in that place...but you have to make a smart bargain there. I send you a PM . I really like the tanto you found for $100...like to see it since I never see a tanto before... it would be nice if you can help me with my sword.

 

regards,

ferry

Posted
The dimension and placement of the two smaller holes is the thing that puzzle me. I've suggested to the owner they were made for a Shingunto

mounting, being the last one in the same position of the Sarute, but it

doesn't work... :?

Otherwise I would have put my money on an old sword abused by a non-traditional polishing. I would like to see BOTH faces of the sword and what's under the Habaki.

 

more pictures,

post-332-14196736711088_thumb.jpg

post-332-14196736714015_thumb.jpg

post-332-1419673671694_thumb.jpg

post-332-1419673672118_thumb.jpg

Posted
I agree with Grey. Looks too well done to be a fake. I would take a shot at genuine, and messed with a bit.

If I look at those 2 smaller ana (holes) in the nakago, they give me the impression that they were added later...maybe to mount non-traditional slab sided grips? I would think the larger one is the original one.

Still..the shape and file marks look ok. I think it is worth looking into, as it is probably genuine (in my humble opinion)

Can't say if it is just a machine made blade or slightly older though. What did the fittings look like, or did you get it this way? I would be interested in knowing what handle they used.

 

Regards,

Brian

 

I got the saya....here is the picture..

post-332-14196736761872_thumb.jpg

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...