blucool Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 First of all, I realize these are not the clearest images, unfortunately this is the best I can do for now. Any help on translation for smith or date is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Philip Quote
Brian Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Philip, Looks dodgy to me from the very limited photos. That mei is signed very badly, and the nakago seems to be brand new with not a trace of ageing or yasurime (filemarks) Hope I am wrong. Brian Quote
blucool Posted March 6, 2007 Author Report Posted March 6, 2007 I was actually told the tang was "cleaned" (by the looks of it, with a stiff wire brush) by the former owner, which also messed up the crisp lines of the mei kanji. That being said, I didn't pay too much for it and I am certain that at the very least the hamon/tempering is definitely genuine. Any thoughts on the mei translation? Quote
Nobody Posted March 7, 2007 Report Posted March 7, 2007 The mei reads "Naminohira (波平)". But actually, it may be a name of a school in Satsuma rather than a specific smith. The date looks "Tenmei Hinoto-Hitsuji (天明丁未)". That is 1787. Quote
Russell P Posted March 7, 2007 Report Posted March 7, 2007 Philip I feel this is what a tang looks like from that school (1800 1850) (my blade) It looks different to yours. Quote
Russell P Posted March 7, 2007 Report Posted March 7, 2007 Wrong picture (I'll try again) same blade in both pictures Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.