Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First of all, I realize these are not the clearest images, unfortunately this is the best I can do for now. Any help on translation for smith or date is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

 

Philip

 

urait7.th.jpg

 

omotepy3.th.jpg

 

bladezc7.th.jpg

Posted

Philip,

 

Looks dodgy to me from the very limited photos. That mei is signed very badly, and the nakago seems to be brand new with not a trace of ageing or yasurime (filemarks)

Hope I am wrong.

 

Brian

Posted

I was actually told the tang was "cleaned" (by the looks of it, with a stiff wire brush) by the former owner, which also messed up the crisp lines of the mei kanji.

 

That being said, I didn't pay too much for it and I am certain that at the very least the hamon/tempering is definitely genuine.

 

Any thoughts on the mei translation?

Posted

The mei reads "Naminohira (波平)". But actually, it may be a name of a school in Satsuma rather than a specific smith. :?:

 

The date looks "Tenmei Hinoto-Hitsuji (天明丁未)". That is 1787.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...