Birdman Posted May 7, 2011 Report Posted May 7, 2011 Can anybody please tell me what, exactly, is the definition of "uchigatana"? Is it a matter of age, blade length, koshirae, or something else? One source I have read says that the uchigatana was the predecessor of the katana. I have seen long wakizashi for sale being described as uchigatana. So what exactly is it? Quote
Birdman Posted May 7, 2011 Author Report Posted May 7, 2011 So it's more a matter of how it's worn, then? Quote
drbvac Posted May 7, 2011 Report Posted May 7, 2011 And the way the signature is - it is the father/older brother of the katana and the curvature etc being a change from the tachi as well as the way it is worn led to the katana. The Japanese as has been noted have many names for the same things. Quote
Birdman Posted May 7, 2011 Author Report Posted May 7, 2011 So, would a blade from the mid-1500's, worn edge-up, with a one-handed grip, but rather long for a wakizashi/too short for a katana (21-23 inch nagasa), and made that size rather than being suriage, likely be a wakizashi or an uchigatana? Quote
cabowen Posted May 7, 2011 Report Posted May 7, 2011 Many period uchigatana are 26-27inches long with a disproportionately short nakago. They were made to be used with one hand, more or less...... Quote
Jacques Posted May 8, 2011 Report Posted May 8, 2011 Hi, One of the oldest uchigatana still extant (Awataguchi ha mid 13th). Nagasa 54cm. Uploaded with ImageShack.us Quote
john weeks Posted May 8, 2011 Report Posted May 8, 2011 Longtime "listener", first time on MB. Noticed the content and thought I'd comment: recently purchased my first signed nihonto and I believe it may fit here. Has a short nakago for one hand use, 23 3/4 in. nagasa. Signed Unshu Kiyanori, Izumo province, 1530. Any thoughts/comments? Quote
John A Stuart Posted May 9, 2011 Report Posted May 9, 2011 Well, the contemporary definition of wakizashi is under 2 shaku in the shakkanho, which is under 23.9" I personally believe if ubu the lengths that are close here are swords made for slighter bushi and would be still uchigatana or katana, but, by our modern definition wakizashi. Pics would be nice. John Quote
estcrh Posted May 9, 2011 Report Posted May 9, 2011 john weeks said: Longtime "listener", first time on MB. Noticed the content and thought I'd comment: recently purchased my first signed nihonto and I believe it may fit here. Has a short nakago for one hand use, 23 3/4 in. nagasa. Signed Unshu Kiyanori, Izumo province, 1530. Any thoughts/comments?Does your sword have a tachi mei? Quote
Birdman Posted May 9, 2011 Author Report Posted May 9, 2011 So could the wakizashi I got from Mark Green, which is ubu mumei but has a 21-3/8" nagasa simply be an uchigatana made for a smaller bushi? Or is it just a rather long wakizashi? Quote
MikeS Posted May 9, 2011 Report Posted May 9, 2011 G'day. There is a Juyo Bunkazai Shizu Kaneuji that is signed katana mei and is a little over 2 shaku (62.4 cm). It is also Kiriha. See Nihon To Koza V.3, page F18-19. As translated by H. Watson, the authors mention that they are unsure if it is "an unusual example of a tachi by Kaneuji or to view it as a relic of the beginning of the uchigatana period..." If we knew what the original koshirae looked like we maybe able to decide. Either way, it is a very interesting sword and I would love to see it one day. Cheers. Mike Smith Sydney, Australia. Quote
john weeks Posted May 19, 2011 Report Posted May 19, 2011 Sorry it took so long...my sword is katana mei. Will TRY to send photos if I can figure out how or get help from someone more computer savvy than me...(which wouldn't take to much!) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.