Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 This is what I believe to be a WWII bring back wrapped in leather with copper underneath the leather. It has no mekugi-ana. It says Tian xin or Tenshin. Kanji has multiple meanings but one of the them that keeps coming up is heavens heart. (or that's at least what I think it says) and says the date (Showa) on the other. I was wondering if someone could translate the date also can someone tell me if this a gift shop sword, made for battle, or a fake. Any information at all really would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Point of this post is for personal knowledge of the item in my possession. Quote
David Flynn Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 I believe it's a Chinese Knockoff Quote
Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Posted January 26, 2011 Is there a reasoning behind this because I know a vet brought it back I didnt purchase it? Quote
Stephen Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 its dated Showa ju ni or 1927....looks like a gunto that was chromed by the GI Quote
Grey Doffin Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 I believe the date is a lucky day in January of 1937. I also think this was chrome/nickel plated by the returning GI after he got back to the States. Grey Quote
Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Posted January 26, 2011 Please take the time to look at all of the pictures and let me know if only one of them is showing up. Quote
Mark Green Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 I agree, It is a real sword that has been plated. I have seen a few of these. A polisher could remove the plating, but not sure it would be worth it for this one. Very likely not. Or it has been put on the buffing wheel to the point of removing file marks??? Need better pics of the whole blade. Mark G Quote
Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Posted January 26, 2011 let me know if you need better pics Quote
Stephen Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 chrome plating can be dipped to be removed but it also removes patina, from the other pix its not worthy of restoration. Id just leave it as it is a oddity Quote
Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Posted January 26, 2011 Thank you for your info and time Quote
george trotter Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 Hi, The two character signature you show seems IMHO to be "TENSHIN" (Heavenly Heart). The tiny "w" stamp you show appears on a couple of examples of wartime swords...the meaning of the "w", who used it etc, have so far (I think) not been positively identified as per group...these include swords signed (slogan) "KOA ISSHIN" (One Heart for United Asia) of the Manchurian iron swords and "TAKE HISA" (unknown smith) and I think there is another name too. I have never seen your "TENSHIN" before, so, even though it is in terrible buffed condition (sorry), it is of interest value to military gunto collectors and researchers as (if not a copy/fake) it would be the only known example of this maker/signature/ w stamp sword...certainly the only one I have seen. Hope this helps, maybe someone has seen this before...? Regards, George. Quote
Mark Green Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 Argoth, It is very hard to tell from your pics. It does look platted in the new pics. Turn of you flash. Just have a few bright lights at other angles. The glare may be messing with us. Regardless, it is a wartime sword. Maybe not even made in Japan. There were smiths working in Manchuria, and maybe Korea as well. Not sure on yours. Try a few no flash pics for us. Mark G Quote
sudden Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 is it just me ? but i don't see a hole for the mekugi Jan Quote
Argoth Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Posted January 26, 2011 I will see If I can get a friend from work that is a photographer to come over and take some more and better pictures. I myself have never had anything done to the sword at all. I dont have the money (Walmart Emloyee) lol! I will see what I can do tomorrow. Quote
nsealrob Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 Hallo Argoth, There are a few points on this blade i find remarkable..... (Please, know i am a newbee...but you never know...) First of all, as Jan allready mentioned before, there is no mekugi-ana... Second... Does this blade have a Flat mune??? Or is it Maru-mune.....(Rounded back) I am not sure, but the combination of the following; No mekugi-ana, a flat mune, a rather slimm shinogi-ji a lack of yokote and an odd looking habaki..... makes me think, this blade is not "so to say" Japanese made...... Dispite the inscriptions of a date and "Tenshin".... At the other hand when there is a W-mark there might be some markings on the nakago-mune.... But at the and i must say... no-one knows what happend to this blade thrue history... and again... you never know! Rob Kauffman Quote
David Flynn Posted January 26, 2011 Report Posted January 26, 2011 I will still go along with my first post. The sword is very crudely made. Also, the W stamp isn't the "Usual", type of W found on Japanese Gunto. May have been made in an occupied country for Sympathisers Quote
Mark Green Posted January 27, 2011 Report Posted January 27, 2011 The more I look at this sword, the more I agree with Dave. ??? Mark G Quote
Argoth Posted January 27, 2011 Author Report Posted January 27, 2011 Just a thought. Could it be possible that this isnt plated at all and that this is a product of using Iron alloys containing Nickle and Chromium? In doing so it would withstand the elements better. People in another forum said they dont think that it was plated. It could potentially explain this so called buffed look. Quote
Bruno Posted January 27, 2011 Report Posted January 27, 2011 I would say buffed instead of chrome plated because it is easier to buff it. I cannot tell for sure weather it is guenine showato or not, please post photos of the mounts it will help us to conclude. Quote
Argoth Posted January 27, 2011 Author Report Posted January 27, 2011 Other forum......Mantetsu-to. Rolled from Manchurian railway tracks. Differential hardening using oil, may have a fairly inactive hamon, but no hada. Quote
Argoth Posted January 27, 2011 Author Report Posted January 27, 2011 Anything more on the markings anyone? Quote
Argoth Posted January 27, 2011 Author Report Posted January 27, 2011 I Found 2 small N's on the hilt just under the Habaki. just saw them. Any meaning? N N Quote
Stephen Posted January 28, 2011 Report Posted January 28, 2011 show us the ha and muni machi...area under the habaki, also pix of the habaki...did not take a good look at it the first time, there have been shrine swords in shirasaya that never got punched or drilled ana. This blade dont look like one and could be a repo...pix please. Quote
loiner1965 Posted January 28, 2011 Report Posted January 28, 2011 i think like stephen that this sword is a shrine piece....unfortunately the nakago looks strange as its been highly buffed to remove all file marks and makes the mei look amaturist.....also the blade as been highly buffed too possibly on a buffing machine Quote
cabowen Posted January 28, 2011 Report Posted January 28, 2011 A blade made for a shrine will not have stamps of any sort on the nakago... Quote
Stephen Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 there have been shrine swords in shirasaya that never got punched or drilled ana to quote myself...I never implied this was that type of sword, just to state the fact about not having a hole makes it a fake. Quote
george trotter Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 I Found 2 small N's on the hilt just under the Habaki. just saw them. Any meaning? N N Argoth (Jon) From the pic of the "n" stamps near the habaki that you sent PM I have no hesitation in saying I think these are definitely mis-struck "w" stamps. I must say, the shape of tang, style of mei writing, absence of a peg-hole all send out warning alarms...I think this sword is too "uncertain" to call...maybe if another by "this maker" turns up we can be a bit more positive. At this point I think it is wise to class it as just too poor in condition to identify. Hope this helps, George. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.