Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking at this particular sword and am wondering if the nakago pictured shows a burned katana? Other than the obvious sahia that would occur does this otherwise destroy all the value of this?

 

Thanks,

Jim

Posted

The nakago doesn't look like burned to "newbie forever" eyes. It shows just show natural patina.

 

I would more look at the blade itself and the gueniness of the mei to evaluate the quality of the sword.

Posted

Hi Muki.

 

I tend to agree with Bruno on this. I dont see in the picture provided, that this is a sword identifiable as damaged by fire and then retempered. Colour and texture however are difficult to reproduce accurately in a photograph and I would reserve positive judgement for an 'in the hand' assessment.

 

To answer your question on value; The nature of a retempered sword is that the steel and its working are still there as the original smith created the blade. The original temper that was his final and most telling work has however been altered by an unknown hand. The sword is therefore not absolutely original. Value comes down to who made the original sword, and how good a job was made of the retempering. That is, how close to the original the now retempered sword is. Value is certainly decreased as an art object, but if the sword is a known blade originally by a famous smith or a sword with a historical significance then the retempering is looked upon as unfortunate but not utterly ruinous, and the sword is therefore judged by an altered set of criteria.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...