Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Bob,

Hard to tell much from the pictures and description: could be naginata naoshi or could be a wakizashi made without a yokote. Nice fuchi/kashira and I like the habaki; the rest of it, unless the buyer gets very lucky, seems way overpriced to me.

Grey

Posted

Thanks guys. Grey, I agree that the price figures in a huge amount of risk, even if the F-K contain solid gold rather than utsuri. I doubt it can be a wakizashi, since I estimate the cutting edge to be about 70 cm+. Steve, I'm not sure it has a yokote - it looks to me to be shobu zukuri-like in shape. Anyway, I might have taken a flyer on it at a fraction of the price, but am still curious as to what it is likely to be, and how old it may be. Cheers, Bob

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Robert , I was the buyer of this sword and thought you would be interested to know how it turned out.

The late Robert Lewert had a Juyo blade by Bishu Suyetsugu that was dated 1378 . This featured in the May 1974 JSSUS Newsletter . The length and shape of Lewerts sword are very similar to the one that I purchased . In the translation of the Juyo write up that is in the Newsletter the shape is described as " Naoshi Nagamaki , shobu zukuri, high shinogi " I think that it is fair to say that the shape of the ebay sword was also Naoshi Nagamaki.

I took a punt on the sword for two reasons . Firstly the mount was in my opinion the best Katana mount that I can recall seeing on ebay for ages .There are lots of mounts with mediocre fittings that come up but I thought this one had some class about it . The Fuchi Kashira were good , tsuba by Owari Sadahiro , fine silver foil habaki and gold foil seppa . As a generalization you would expect a mount of this class to have an OK blade in it . Secondly the blade was Nagamaki Naoshi and as you said, seemed to be about 70 cm long.The very few blades of this style that I have seen in books or in the flesh all seem to be attributed to or be by Nambokucho smiths so I thought that there must be a reasonable prospect that this blade was too.

When it did turn up the mount was as classy as I had hoped for. The blade is 68 cm long and is in fair condition . The hamon is nioi based and I would decribe it as undulating suguha with some Ko midare and ashi . There are a couple of rounded spots in one area of thi Ji which might be shintetsu . I think I have got myself a probable cut down Nambokucho Nagamaki . There is a shinsa out here in September and I will put the blade in that and see what the experts think !

Ian B

Posted

That's really exciting Ian. I definitely thought it was a nagamaki, and I'm glad to hear that you like it, aside from the shintetsu. I would have given you a run for your money if there was even a shred of visible hamon in any of the photos but there wasn't. I wasn't prepared to take the chance that it would come without any hamon at all or with a Nioigiri. I'm happy for you that it came through mostly healthy. Do keep us up to date with the shinsa and polishing results. Cheers, Bob

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Hi Robert,

We had our NTHK Shinsa in Sydney a couple of weeks ago and I submitted the sword for judgement.

Like many ( most ? ) of the submitters my optomistic hopes were dashed. I had hoped that the piece might have been by a Bitchu Aoe smith of the Nambokucho period. This was based on the nioi based hamon , what a few of us thought was sumi hada and the fact that this school made blades of this shape .

As things turned out it was papered to the Kai Mihara group circa 1530 . Seems that many of us are guilty of excessive optimism when it comes to assessing what we own.

Ian B

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...