BRUNROX Posted November 15, 2010 Report Posted November 15, 2010 Greetings ! I have a Wakizashi that I translated to Suzuki Kaga Kami Sadanori. I understand that it would be a Shinto era sword, and made by the Shodai, Settsu Province. (If I am wrong on any of this please correct me.) My request is for an Oshigata of this Smith, my library is very thin, and also a correct translation of the date. The first Kanji I believe is for the Genroku period, but can not seem to put it all together. (Still a NewB ) Thanks to all. Best Regards, Mario P. http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Fx ... directlink http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/BT ... directlink http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Jk ... directlink http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Jk ... directlink Quote
Jacques Posted November 15, 2010 Report Posted November 15, 2010 Hi, The nengo reads Genroku hachi nen ni gatsu hi. (1795, 2nd month) Sadanori was in the Inoue Shinkai school. This sword is probably gimei; i will provide an oshigata tomorrow. Quote
BRUNROX Posted November 15, 2010 Author Report Posted November 15, 2010 Thank You Jacques, I'm very interested in seeing original Oshigata. This is a typical example of "Buy the blade, not the name". I had no idea of who the Smith was when I bought it, until I did some research when back at home. Ironically ,after hours of comparing Kanji symbols, the only one I was able to descipher was the "Nori" Kanji, and from there working backwards. (I did mention I'm a NewB). Regards, Mario P. Quote
BRUNROX Posted November 16, 2010 Author Report Posted November 16, 2010 Thank You Gentlemen, I can see some significant differences in the Kanji from these examples. Jacques , Isn't the Genroku Period from 1688 to 1703 ? Your translation on the Date was 1795, mistake in the typing or is that was is actually written ? Your help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Mario P. Quote
Jacques Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Hi, Jacques , Isn't the Genroku Period from 1688 to 1703 ? Your translation on the Date was 1795, mistake in the typing or is that was is actually written ? Yes it's a big mistake, date is 1695. Sorry Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.