Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a wakizashi signed BiShu Osafune Yokoyama Sukenaga saku - Tomonari 58th generation. I have attached a couple of pictures. The work looks classic for ShinShinto Bizen Yokoyama school, before seeing the mei i would have said Sukekane. I am having some trouble trying to figure out who this maker is and where he fits. The "big" Sukenaga was 56th gen, the Meikan mentions a 59th generation. There are other makers from the group who use the 56th, 57th, 58th generation. I guess it could be gimei but i do not think so. Does anyone have any info on this 58th gen Sukenaga? any chance this was a mei used by someone who changed their name later? If i have made any mistakes with translation let me know. Thanks!

post-102-14196790161327_thumb.jpg

post-102-14196790163901_thumb.jpg

post-102-1419679016685_thumb.jpg

post-102-14196790169346_thumb.jpg

Posted

when i tried to read the meikan it listed the 2 generations but i thought it said the second gen was 59th gen Tomonari..... if i read that right this must fit in between???

Posted

Mark,

 

The Osafune Choshi Token Hen has an example of a Sukenaga Daito. I quickly glanced the commentary and it notes that he called himself the 58th generation from Tomonari. I don't have the ability to resize the scans so I'll email them to you.

 

I had a sword signed the 57th generation that was also signed Sukenaga. There's a bit of vaguery in a couple of these generations and that was capitalized on by forgers. Finding hardfast examples can be a challenge and shinsa may be the only choice if the work looks righteous.

Posted

Whoops...My bad, I was in a bit of a hurry and misread the comment and it's 56th generation. No good deed goes unpunished. :) Anyways.. the Choshu Hen goes from Sukenaga (56th) to the next sword which is Sukekane, who signed 58th generation. I have a yari here that is signed 58th generation, Sukekane. The Toko Taikan shows the shodai Sukenaga (56th) and and the nidai Sukenaga (57th), both on page 337. There is also a Sukekane 58th on page 329.

 

As Chris pointed out, maybe there was an undocumented sandai Sukenaga that signed 58th generation as well? :dunno:

Posted

The inscription 58 dai mago on your Wakizashi is not in accordance with Sukenaga...1795-1851...Those who added Tomonari 58 dai mago to their signatures were Sukekane and Sukeyoshi.

 

The hamon though displays a seemingly kobushigata choji and starts with a yakidashi, the nioiguchi is crisp. These characteristics belong to the workmanship of Sukenaga but his hamon is more vivid.

 

The first pic is a Wakizashi 36.5 cm - Bizen Osafune Yokoyama Sukenaga - Tomonari 56 dai mago - Bunsei 10 (1827)

 

Hope you see the differences.

 

Eric

post-369-14196790195011_thumb.png

post-369-14196790197962_thumb.jpg

post-369-14196790198936_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hey guys,

 

Timely thread. The kid has a wakizashi by one of these two sukenagas - trouble is that I can't figure out whether it is the shodai or nidai

(comments?) Its signed differently (with the mon/ichi symbol (as described in the blerb above):" [Kikumon] Ichi Biyo Osafune Shi Yokoyama

Kaganosuke Fujiwara Ason Sukenaga February, Koka 3rd year" (1846) - wish I could read Japanese better so I could puzzle out the taikan

entry :-/

 

It has hozon papers, so I'd guess the mei is probably right for whichever one did it...

 

Here's a rubbing of the nakago:

 

SukeN6a.jpg

 

and here's a pic of the blade:

 

SukeN4a.jpg

 

Hopefully this doesn't just confuse things...

 

Best,

 

rkg

(Richard George)

Posted
  rkg said:
The kid has a wakizashi by one of these two sukenagas - trouble is that I can't figure out whether it is the shodai or nidai

 

Pic 1 - HAWLEY

A - 1830-51 - 60 points - kiku ichi - Kaganosuke

B - 1830-65 - 10 points - kiku ichi - Kaganosuke - Ason

shodai and nidai?

 

Pic 2 - FUJISHIRO

no hint to a nidai Sukenaga

 

Pic 3 - Katana 68.1 cm

Yokoyama Kaganosuke Fujiwara Ason Sukenaga - Tenpo 15 (1844)

kiku ichi Biyo Osafune Go

 

Pic 4 - Katana 70.3 cm

Bizen Osafune Ju Yokoyama Daisaburo Fujiwara Sukenaga - Keio 3 (1867)

Kimi Banzai Tomonari 59 Dai Mago

 

Until now I haven‘t seen a kanteisho with designation to „nidai“ Sukenaga.

 

Eric

post-369-14196790338197_thumb.jpg

post-369-14196790338868_thumb.png

post-369-14196790340419_thumb.jpg

post-369-14196790341576_thumb.jpg

  • 9 months later...
Posted

Howdy Mark

 

I saw the MEI and noticed that there are som simularities to a sword that I own. I am not sure which SUKENAGA mine is, but perhaps it could help you in the search of your smith.

 

Please check it out.

 

/Martin

Posted

thanks, i will probably take mine to the SF show and put it out for sale so if you are there stop at my table and check it out

  • 2 years later...
Posted

Hello,

 

sorry to open this thread again but I found on the Web a balde which is confusing me.

It is signed - Bizen Osafune ju Yokoyama Sukehiro - (see attached picture).

But this blade is confusing me: It is signed with 59th gen. Tomonari. But as stated above in this thread, Sukenaga signed the 59th gen. Tomonari?!

I am not sure, but I think this Sukehiro is SUK690 (Stud. of Sukenaga). Tomonari?!

 

The other question I have is if I am right with my assumption that the is the long form of ?!

 

Ay information would be very appreciated.

many thanks in advance

Klaus

post-1134-14196917548751_thumb.jpg

Posted

Mark, thank you for an interesting thread. I showed it to my sword teacher here who has been doing some research in this area.

 

Would it be possible to post some close-up shots of the yasuri-me? Thanks.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...