Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks Chris,

Not likely the Shinkai. Likely gemei.

The sword looks Shinshin copy of Nambu era

I'm helping a friend sell it.

Flawless 28+in monster, with cool fish-tail hamon. If the current sale falls through I will try to list it here.

Here are a few pics

post-99-14196786783023_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196786784432_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196786785544_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196786835501_thumb.jpg

Posted

Yes it sure is!

I always thought is was kinda silly for someone to Gemei this blade. It just didn't make any sense. I have never seen a 'Shinkai' blade other than the period style.

I guess if you selling to some clueless army officer before ww2, that Mei may bring some extra cash

I guess there was a couple other smiths that signed this way??

Just seems strange.

Posted

One interesting question?:

If Kunisada II started signing Inoue Shinkai around Kan-bun 12 (1672) and En-po starts 1673, where do we put Kan-bun 13?

Posted

En-po may have started as late as december 1673 (death) so 1673 before that would be Kanbun 13......... remember too that news took longer to travel to distant parts (not the case here )

Posted

Actually, there is no inconsistency at least about the date.

 

The last day of Kanbun era;

Kanbun 13th year, 9th month, 20th day (= Oct. 29, 1673 in the Gregorian calendar)

 

The first day of Enpo era;

Enpo 1st year, 9th month, 21st day (= Oct. 30, 1673 in the Gregorian calendar)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...