Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First I want to say Hi to everyone. This looks to be a really cool place, been lurking for a few days.

 

--------------

 

I have a WWII Japanese sword that I purchased years ago and I'm just now trying to get some info on it.

 

I think I have it fairly accurately translated, but it wasn't on a sword message board so I thought I'd come to the experts and get it verified.

 

Pictures first then what info I've been able to acquire.

 

 

4841927329_365b8a9da9_b.jpg

 

4841927029_f019717424_b.jpg

 

4842545210_e215104d1d_b.jpg

 

4841925993_e11962d217_b.jpg

 

昭和十九年六月 (showa jyu nen roku getsu) = year 19 of showa era, June.

June 1944

信光 : Nobumitsu

In red : 二九六 〇 = 2960

 

What do you guys think?

I'm guessing, but do you think the red paint would just be for inventory purposes?

Also on the JSSUS site I found this.

Nobumitsu

信光

Chikushu ju Sa

1926

Is there any other information on this guy? I don't have any pics of the blade and fittings at the moment, but will put some up if there's interest. Everything looks in pretty good shape to me.

 

Thanks in advance.

Posted

Thanks Mark for the info.

 

Charlie thanks for the link I used that site to kinda verify what some others have given me.

Any links telling who he was or any details about his work.

 

I'm pretty sure this sword isn't traditionally made. I've looked really closely and as bad as I would want it to be I really doubt it is.

Posted
  Basho12 said:
I'd also check Nobumitsu(s) 3 and 4 at the link above. They both look like nakarishi mei by the same cutter.

 

Don't see a link on my screen :?:

 

BTW - I don't think the oshigata on Rich Stein's site matches this mei.

 

Charlie Brashear

Posted

I just meant the link you'd already referenced. There are some differences, but both of the ones on Rich Stein's site (Nobumitsu 3 &4) look like they were cut by the same person who did the mei on this sword.

Posted
  Basho12 said:
I just meant the link you'd already referenced. There are some differences, but both of the ones on Rich Stein's site (Nobumitsu 3 &4) look like they were cut by the same person who did the mei on this sword.

 

:oops: Can't seem to follow my own train of thought. :roll: Concur that it resembles Nobumitsu(4) much more than Nobumitsu(5).

 

Charlie Brashear

Posted

Thanks guys for your help.

 

Does the rest of the translation seem correct?

 

I have some more pics of the rest of the sword, I have to get them uploaded first though.

Posted

Interesting comparison on the nakarishi mei(s) on Rich S's link, and importat to note how the same cutter who was doing Nagamitsu's mei was also doing the signatures on plain Showato as well.

 

I think the date translation is spot on: June 1944 (Showa 19, sixth month)

Posted
  Basho12 said:
Interesting comparison on the nakarishi mei(s) on Rich S's link, and importat to note how the same cutter who was doing Nagamitsu's mei was also doing the signatures on plain Showato as well.

 

I think the date translation is spot on: June 1944 (Showa 19, sixth month)

 

With due respect, I don't think the Sukemitsu/Nobumitsu mei were done by the same hand as Nagamitsu's. While there may be a slight resemblence, the mei are basically quite different. Remember a lot of Nagamitsu and Emura blades were signed by students.

 

Rich S

Posted

Also remember that Nagamitsu and Emura worked in Okayama while Sukemitsu/Nobumitsu worked in Seki. So I really doubt they would have had the same person carving mei.

 

Rich S

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...