Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Endrass said:

what is the theory about this...

Mario, thanks for the post.  Looking at the files, seems I logged that one in last year when I read the book, too.  My general feeling is that these numbers are put there by Army Arsenal inspectors.  Yet, some, like the navy blades, may not fit that mold.  These two examples, with the Suya logo right by the number, could indicate the number was put there by the shop that made the blade.  For years, we had all assumed they were stamped in by the fittings shops, and honestly some may have come about that way, but most of them follow a sequential flow over time, specific to each smith, and to me, that speaks of Army behavior, not random shops (of which there were over 1,000 operating during the war).  But it's still quite an unknown issue.

 

@Kiipu - Thomas, do you, or anyone else, have photos of that Yoshichika with the Suya 14 on it?  I have it logged into my chart, but found out I have no photos on file.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks to everyone for your answers!. I will continue to study and keep my eyes open for new examples to confirm the hypotheses (I would love to become a contributor to Bruce's register :)).

 

@Bruce Pennington Thomas included the link to your old comment  in an earlier post in this thread. I attach it anyway.

 

https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/33862-murata-swords-村田刀/page/2/#comment-361793

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Endrass said:

Thomas included the link to your old comment  in an earlier post in this thread. I attach it anyway.

Thanks Mario!  Another one of those where I logged it into the chart and got distracted, forgetting to save the photos.

 

I want to correct my statement above about the navy blades - I don't have enough signed and dated Navy blades with stamped numbers to determine if they fit the same pattern as the Army stampings.  But with the mumei blades, the number very well could be in sequential order.  Without dates, it's not possible to know for a fact, but they do appear to be an intentional flow of numbers like the Army system.

Posted

Trystan,

These 1886 pattern Cavalry, or Type 8?, swords are a mystery.  I have one other with a double stamp, different logo, on file.  I suspect they were shops making these swords, but have no data on them.  Here's the other one I have:

434991807_CompanyLogo2.jpg.2232b08494446b1a621183b6ccb6cb08.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I get to talking statistics on various stamps on other threads when they come into the discussion, but I realize it would be beneficial to keep them centralized on this thread.  So, here is a link to a post where I updated the latest observations about the Saka stamp: 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, MarcoUdin said:

A numbered blade for Bruce, in an unfamiliar Kyu koshirae to my knowledge 

Thanks Marco!  That is definitely unusual koshirae.  Blade is legit, but I wonder about the fittings.  Yet, there was admittedly quite a lot of variation in those swords.

 

Pics added in case the link above goes dead in the future.

15999-2.thumb.jpg.1a71bd9b7aa9a378f82e80c20e394f88.jpg

1461779258_Screenshot2022-07-22174547.thumb.jpg.45f12c81a671dc33248ba1f46c69cb6b.jpg1769223529_Screenshot2022-07-22174717.thumb.jpg.895604cf27054eecb493d13ca3937120.jpg

Posted

Hi Bruce, not to bring up an old item. However, I see you posted Saka stamps for reference. Regarding Nagamitsu and the katakana for ichi, I do wonder if this was an indication the sword was made by him. Kind of like the two stroke Naga vs other mei. As we can can assume he had others making blades given the number produced and the varying signatures. I also say this as after a polish, this Nagamitsu Saku, mune saka ichi 0313, has some of the best hada (see my name lol) and interesting hamon activity for RS I have seen. In addition the ichi kata seems rather rare.

 

For reference:

 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Ooitame said:

the ichi kata seems rather rare.

Eric,

It is rare.  I have only 3 with the kana + number.  All 3 have different mei, even!  Your theory could be correct, but no way to know.  After going through my files, I found 2 blades with an "一 (ichi)" as part of the mei, numbers 143 and 695, but 695 doesn't use the kana.

 

Here are the Nagamitsu I have on file, all are undated:

 

Number     Mei

イ143        Ichi Naga mitsu saku

イ313              Naga mitsu saku

695           Ichi Naga mitsu saku

1431               Naga mitsu saku

1867               Naga mitsu saku

2005          [8 kanji mei]

イ2511      [8 kanji mei]

3490               Naga mitsu saku

3973               Naga mitsu saku

3991               Naga mitsu saku

 

So, the 3 blades with kana + number have 3 different mei styles.  Don't know what to make of it.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Ooitame said:

still unsure myself

Ok, sorry it took me so long to remember this, but I have been tracking blades with katakana + number, and they seem to be tied to the prefecture of the smith.  In some cases, we have more than one smith from the same prefecture with the same kana, which confirms the theory.  In the case of Nagamitsu, we don't have another smith's blade with the mark as confirmation, but it fits the same pattern as the others.  Part of the mystery is that some of his blades are numbered without kana. 

 

So still a mystery, but I believe it is a prefecture designation.  Maybe an Army inspector stationed in that prefecture, in this case Fukuoka, used this kana.

282970723_Katakanawithnumbersupdated.thumb.jpg.119bde173cca26263d17fce4466503be.jpg

Posted

Hmmm.  6 kanji mei, leaves off the 2 kanji above the "ichi".  I'll take these over to Translations for clarification.  His name was Ichihara Ichiryushu Nagamitsu, so I suspect the 6 kanji mei left off one of the names.

 

Also Interesting is the open heart, or open boar's eye stamp on the seppa.  I have one of these on record, and in the Stamps Doc, but cannot find the original.  I think I got it from one of Neil's @IJASWORDS gunto.  Neil, do you recall this one, and if so, which sword was it mounted on?  Was it your Nagamitsu?

2036193593_Screenshot2022-07-26070107.thumb.jpg.4cbb2d0dda9c2a67fbfe5201fe938c1b.jpg

Posted

Hi Bruce, I have considered an inspector stamp as a possibilty. However would the stamp not be a arsenal, unit, or star stamp. Also I believe Nagamitsu worked from Osaka; not sure if it falls under the Fukuoka prefecture.

 

P.S. I saw a document sometime back for inspection marks and noticed the ichi kana. Might be worth a dig.

Posted
15 hours ago, Ooitame said:

Nagamitsu worked from Osaka

Ahem.... I just got an education!  Re-read Slough's pages on Nagamitsu - both of them!  Seems there was an RJT qualified ENDO Nagamitsu working from Fukuoka.  He used a variety of mei, including a 2 kanji.  But the other guy was Ichihara Ichiryushi Nagamitsu who worked from Osaka, and used quite a variety of mei.  Since we have a 'イ' stamped blade with the Ichihara mei, we can assume all 3 of them were by Ichihara, and therefore, the mark is an Osaka mark, not Fukuoka (not to mention the fact that both the 143 and 2511 blades also have the Saka stamp!!!).  I'll make the change to the Stamps Doc. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi Bruce, one more Yamamoto shop stamp on a sword by Yasuoki. The trend of the officers name on the Tsuba continues and also note the specific hanger pattern from this shop. So now we know this shop was producing military fittings from at least the late 20's/early 30's (Kyu Gunto), mid 30's (Type 94) and early 40's (Type 98).

 

https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/r1058686955

 

image.thumb.png.9b6c51ed06087defec46a3b8fc7abba2.png

image.thumb.png.910e4e0a4d549f901989ef310303bc46.png

image.png.a7c9dbe5faab9ead71bbce95ccd1d931.pngimage.png.cb1e9c2d01aff713354706cb25bb511a.png

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...