Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok took a few more of the nakago.

 

Someone did a very nice job on the finish work.

File work on the end

 

Is that a line between Jacket steel and core steel, that I am seeing along the mune side of the Nakago, or am I seeing things?

 

Just looking at the top and bottom of the 'now' nakago. I would think the original machi was close to the area marked by the wood. I will try to see where that line of jacket steel/core steel ends, (if thats what I'm seeing) that may tell us a lot.

 

I will try to get some good, full lenght shots tomorrow

post-99-14196780611173_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196780613324_thumb.jpg

post-99-1419678061431_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196780616188_thumb.jpg

Posted

Mark,

 

Great photos of the nakago you posted today.

 

--Camera work and I mix worse than oil and water--

 

I expected Tom or Ted T. to come along and hit the nail on the head, but I think I will try and take a break from my gawd awful work to crack open the mini library and see if I cannot make sense of what I see. I still don't understand the hamon. Any Nie at all? If so, where and what sort of distribution?

Posted

Hi Gang,

Yes, there seems to be a good bit of ura-nie running the length of the sword, just above the hamon, as expected.

There seems to be so much ji-nie, and much chikei, throughout the jigane.

The polish is quite scuffed up so it is difficult to get good nie pics.

Here are a few I have enlarged of the nie, and chikei

in the Boshi

post-99-14196780617049_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196780619741_thumb.jpg

post-99-1419678062243_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I took a few more pics. My camera like to take close pics, but I haven't yet figured out how to get good long pics.

I've been doing a lot of research, I feel now that this sword may well have been 80cm or longer. With a 1.7 or so torisori. I'm starting to think it is much older then I first thought.

 

I tried to get a shot of the activity in the hamon.

 

I feel it should go to shinsa. Who has the Shinsa service deals going for SF show? I will be away that week.

post-99-14196781288906_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196781289729_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196781290985_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196781295207_thumb.jpg

post-99-14196781299636_thumb.jpg

  • 1 year later...
Posted
other than battle damage, or the non samurai clause, why else would a sword be shortened? A nice sword with bo-hi, cut nakago and several remounts seems to me to be a good candidate for some kind of action other than sitting on the mantle, overhearing politics.

 

Reasons to shorten a sword:

 

1. I'm short and don't ride a horse and this here sword is too long.

 

2. I want this sword, in those mounts.

 

3. Oops, I accidentally the sword in half.

 

4. Ooops, forgot to oil this one over the last century and too bad about that sukashi rust.

 

5. Oooops, I accidentally polished through your hamon. I fixed your tachi by turning it into a wakizashi. Your bill is for full polish of the katana plus o-suriage. If you want me to move the Sadamune mei into the new position that will be extra. Ah don't worry, I think you should just forget about it because most of his are not signed anyway, this way it will just blend in with the others. Save the money.

Posted

Mark, congrats on your papers. :clap: If you ever have this restored, it would be nice to see pics. Considering the apparent original length, and characteristics and quality of craftsmanship, my guess would be for the shodai.

Posted
other than battle damage, or the non samurai clause, why else would a sword be shortened? A nice sword with bo-hi, cut nakago and several remounts seems to me to be a good candidate for some kind of action other than sitting on the mantle, overhearing politics.

 

I've come into this just now, but have to say there is one prime reason that old swords were shortened in more modern times...as this one seems to me to be... I've seen a few koto o-suriage Kyugunto mounted swords over the past few years or so and I must say the shape, style, placement of the last (top) hole and "freshness" of the this nakago shortening, and the overall shorter length of the sword, reminds me strongly of these o-suriage blades in Kyugunto mounts of Meiji era. So, would I be crazy to say this blade looks to me to be a prime candidate of a sword shortened for a kyugunto usage? The sword lengths of modern era (especially it seems Meiji era) military use were much shorter than of previous eras so this explains why the sword was shortened "recently" IMHO.

What were the fittings Mark...any clues?

Even if we never know...still a nice Den Uda Kunimune blade...congrats indeed.

Regards,

Posted
Hi,

Paper says *Den* Uda Kunimitsu, it is not a direct attribution, however, i don't know exactly that NTHK NPO does mean by using this term

 

It says 'Den' Etchu Uda KUNIMUNE, and I was assuming mabey the NTHK NPO were using the same logic as the NBTHK, that 'Den' as a prefix means the blade has some quality that falls outside of what's normally expected for the smith... but mabey not. Regardless, it still looks alot like the work of the shodai KUNIMUNE to me... and agian, that's just a slightly educated guess and not something anyone should put much faith in. :D

Posted

Below are links to some articles that explain anattribution of "Den" before a smith's name. I have the same thing on a papered sword, and from what I've read it appears they've attributed your sword directly to Etchu Uda Kunimune

(If that's a standard way of using that terminology across different groups ofsword study in Japan as Adam stated before me)

From Darcy's Nihonto.ca and Bob Benson's sites:

http://www.nihonto.ca/classification.html

One very important thing to note is that if Den is used before the name of a swordsmith, it is not talking about a tradition. For example, Den Kinju or Den Niji Kunitoshi means in regards to an example of their work that it is not exactly the sum of their known characteristics.

In the case of these smiths where many unsigned works have been attributed, the characteristics are formed from old written reports and what can be observed in the realm of the signed works left to us. For smiths with only few (or no) signed works left, it makes it hard to establish a complete reference to their overall style. Given that a smith could work for decades, and styles evolved, it should be clear how difficult it can be to make a perfect reference out of a handful of examples. When Den is used like this, the work may be considered to have a small number of features that are over and above the expectations for the smith, or it may be missing a small number of features. It absolutely does not mean that the work was made (or possibly made) by one of the smith's students and it is not a mark of uncertainty of the attribution.

 

http://www.bushidojapaneseswords.com/Den%20article.htm

 

Regards,

Lance

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...