Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In my opinion this tsuba was made as it is depicted. If You imagine the folded area flat again, there would be a considerably larger space below the nakago-ana so there would be an distinctly unbalance.

In a symbolistic way the crooked and bend design could emphasize a destructive impression.

Without a practical purpose it is of course a bizarre collector’s item from later Edo-Period.

Greetings,

Florian

Posted

Tim’s tsuba is signed SUIJO ADZUMA OKABE MASANOBU, and is presumably the work of that artist (H 04308.0), working in Mito ca 1800, since such a signature is unlikely to be gimei. I agree that it shows no signs of having been mounted, but was probably intended for use at the time of its manufacture. Personally, I find it rather vulgar and with little to recommend it.

 

John L.

Posted

I agree it's a reasonably ok tsuba made ugly, from from the perspective of an iaido student, it would have the advantage of making it impossible for one's katana to roll when set on the floor.

 

with tongue firmly in cheek,

 

Craig

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...