Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Navy said:

Why "marine" sword?

 

There is a common misconception amongst militaria collectors that swords in this style of mounts are "navy/marine landing forces" swords. 

 

Conway 

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Kiipu said:

Carefully look for a "star" stamp and check the nakago mune (top of the tang) for any markings.

Thanks-will do next time i am where the sword is and report back-I had taken these pics before i was schooled

to look on top of nakago -

Thanks

I appreciate everyone's replies

Steve

Posted
5 hours ago, lonely panet said:

are the type 3s with rjt smiths popular?? got one i want to sell?


Speaking personally; absolutely!

Of all the WW2 koshirae types, I've always admired the "Type 3" fittings

Posted

And the star blades, gendaito, go for higher prices when the seller knows what he has.

 

Reposting @SteveM's comment about the "Toshin" for ease:

"In this case, Tōshin (東神) is a part of a longer name 日本刀東神鍛錬所 Japanese Sword Tōshin Forge. "Eastern Deity" is the direct, literal translation of the two characters that comprise the word tōshin, but in this case I think its just a name, and it alludes to the smith being affiliated with that particular forge. "

 

I have one other Masakuni on file, used "Toshin" in the mei, and 3 Masashige.  Interested in hearing from Mal on this. [edited.  Had 2 Masakuni, but turned out they were the same sword, posted by 2 different guys]

 

And waiting to hear back on the star and mune number.  I have another Masashige with the number "71".  Could not confirm it's location as it came from the text describing the blade on a sale page.

 

Steve,

Posting links to Nick Komiya's revelations about the history, making, and marketing of the Rinji seishiki, or Type 3, or Contengency model, Type 44, Marine Landing Sword.  For those who don't follow links, the executive summary: Designed in 1938, using a loophole in the Type 98 Emperor authorization, to be a cheaper, more durable sword than the 98.  Never was given an official designation (however turns out NONE of the officer swords were actually called "Type XX" by the military).  Marketed in 1940, didn't really catch on until 1943 and on.  An Army sword, not Navy, not Marine.

 

True Significance of the Contengency Model sword Mistakenly Called the Type 3

 

Unveiling the Rinji-seishiki - 1940

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Bruce my assumption was that i was looking on spine of the nakago for star and did not

see anything other than 2-2 stamp (what does that represent ?) I can look a little harder on

Nakago next visit -any particular place i should focus on -

Thanks Steve

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...