Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone! I just wanted to get your thoughts on this sword. It doesn’t have any paperwork so I thought I might have more trained eyes give me an opinion. Do we think the attribution to tatara nagayuki is accurate? 
 

in my research,“Nagayuki work displays a powerful O-Choji Midare of the Ichimonji School, Hiraki-Gunome-Choji Midare and Koshi no Hiraita Midare similar to Sue-Bizen Yosozaemon Sukesada. The hamon is generally based on nioi-deki, but not a pure nioi-deki as a hint of nie can be seen. He was also one of the few smiths that was able to produce Utsuri during the Shinto period.”


Any opinions on this piece would be appreciated! 

 

IMG_9034.jpeg

IMG_9033.jpeg

IMG_9032.jpeg

IMG_9031.jpeg

IMG_9030.jpeg

IMG_9029.jpeg

IMG_9028.jpeg

IMG_9027.jpeg

IMG_9021.jpeg

IMG_9022.jpeg

IMG_9023.jpeg

IMG_9024.jpeg

IMG_9025.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...