hudomeld Posted Sunday at 01:11 PM Report Posted Sunday at 01:11 PM Hello all, Recently i purchased a tachi.. It is signed but i think it is irrelevant at first.. later on i will reveal it of course.. Nagasa 75cm Ubu nakago Blade 29mm and 19mm at kissaki Thickness 7 and 5mm At this point i really would appreciate your experienced oppinion about the age from the sugata, jihada and jigane as well as hamon.. Many thanks in advance David Quote
Ray Singer Posted Sunday at 01:37 PM Report Posted Sunday at 01:37 PM I would have thought this is an ubu shinshinto blade. 4 Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 02:20 PM Report Posted Sunday at 02:20 PM hi, why do you think it's from kamakura period? For me it looks like shinto or shinshinto. Is there a signature on the nakago? regards Oli Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted Sunday at 02:28 PM Report Posted Sunday at 02:28 PM Oli, he said it is signed but he is not going to show us yet. You can see 造, but above that he has blanked it off. 1 Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 02:38 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 02:38 PM Sorry for hiding the mei.. I really did not want to have the blade judged by the mei.. Myself i think it is no way the Moriie mei could be authentic.. I also did not buy it because of the mei.. 1 Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 02:58 PM Report Posted Sunday at 02:58 PM hmm like a small kantai? The nagasa and sugata trends into direction shinshinto. Ubu Kamakura blades have a different sugata and are hard to find or get. Example: https://www.aoijapan.net/tachi-moriie-hatakeda/ Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 03:05 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 03:05 PM I really dont know where to position it.. For my -completely untrained- eyes the nakago looks older than shinshinto forgot to mention the sori is 2,6cm Quote
Jacques Posted Sunday at 03:37 PM Report Posted Sunday at 03:37 PM A bad gimei of Moriie who was a great Kamakura Bizen Smith (Saijo) Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM Report Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM the pictures aren't the best. Yes maybe late muromachi or early shinto. But for kamakura its looks too good. 1 Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 04:00 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 04:00 PM Thats what i thought too.. for kamakura.. it is in a too good shape Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 04:01 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 04:01 PM As far as i read not many Moriie gimei out there... Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 05:01 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 05:01 PM Not as i would want to proof that the mei is authentic.. but it is not looking very freshly made.. Or am i completely wrong.. Quote
Brian Posted Sunday at 05:09 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:09 PM Yeah, but remember that they have been doing gimei for hundreds of years,. Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 05:34 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 05:34 PM Of course i have that in mind.. I am currently wondering if a sec. Or third gen. Moriie in the post hatakeda times could possibly have forged the blade and in this case the mei could be so called authentic.. Sure.. not for hatakeda.. You probably saw some mei in your life.. from the nakagos overall appearance.. does the mei match the period when the blade was forged or do you see it as beeing signed later..? Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 05:39 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:39 PM Do you want to know, when this gimei is made? Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 05:58 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:58 PM here is an interesting article about gimei https://markussesko.com/2019/12/31/kajihei-鍛冶平/ Quote
Rivkin Posted Sunday at 06:17 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:17 PM shinshinto, not the first tier smith influenced by period's Bizen school - Yokoyama and Chounsai. Poor quality jigane (100% dense). 1 Quote
Lewis B Posted Sunday at 06:19 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:19 PM Genuine Kamakura era Mei (1st generation), although there were later generations also signing Moriie well into the Nanbokucho period. 1 Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 06:34 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 06:34 PM Ray, Oli and Lewis.. thanks for the reference mei Although for me they look completely different Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 06:54 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 06:54 PM Rivkin, not so dense at all, Just forgive me for my bad photogarphic skills with my old phone.. other than that it looks like the polish is not a perfect job, it hides a lot of the jigane structure.. at least on the photos.. i have to admit that Quote
Jacques Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM 52 minutes ago, oli said: here is an interesting article about gimei https://markussesko.com/2019/12/31/kajihei-鍛冶平/ Kajihei is a special case, but it's worth noting that while gimei have always been made, many of those found today were made recently, and are called gendai gimei. 1 Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 07:01 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 07:01 PM According the difference in gimei and gendai gimei signatures.. Please tell me that mine is not a gendai.. that is probably the only thing i really hope for Quote
oli Posted Sunday at 07:03 PM Report Posted Sunday at 07:03 PM 3 minutes ago, Jacques said: Kajihei is a special case, but it's worth noting that while gimei have always been made, many of those found today were made recently, and are called gendai gimei. yes you a right, i only wanted to mention how a faker work and how they fake nakago and signatures. Quote
Franco Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Report Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM One more opinion, Shape suggests a Muromachi period sword. The question then becomes; is it truly a Muromachi period sword or an elaborate Shinshinto copy? 7 hours ago, hudomeld said: Nagasa 75cm Ubu nakago Blade 29mm and 19mm at kissaki Thickness 7 and 5mm What is the kasane at the widest point of the nakago vs at the mune-machi? What does the ko-shinogi look like from above? To my eye the ji-tetsu looks more Shinshinto as does the nakago patina vs Koto. "Too good for Kamakura." Hmm. Quote
hudomeld Posted Sunday at 09:09 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 09:09 PM So. The nakago widest kasane is 7.2mm The mune kassane 6.9 or 7mm Some photos attached.. Quote
Rivkin Posted Monday at 12:19 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:19 AM 5 hours ago, hudomeld said: Rivkin, not so dense at all, Just forgive me for my bad photogarphic skills with my old phone.. other than that it looks like the polish is not a perfect job, it hides a lot of the jigane structure.. at least on the photos.. i have to admit that Different light direction can really affect hada appearance, but still I see the hada which is coarse with visible lamination in places, but otherwise has this dense, grey look... No color changes, utsuri, no ji nie, just greying itame. Nakago can be late koto, sugata can be late koto, but this very distinctive periodic choji gunome, each having exactly the same very solid and single tone, but relatively bright appearance - does not look like koto. Its a shinshinto style and something that quite a few practiced at the time. Same about hada, I don't see the variety one expects from koto, to me its more modern. Quote
Franco Posted Monday at 03:36 AM Report Posted Monday at 03:36 AM 6 hours ago, hudomeld said: The nakago widest kasane is 7.2mm The mune kassane 6.9 or 7mm Not polished down much. Certainly not what might be expected of an earlier Koto period sword. At this point my thought is a Shinshinto copy. Thank you for the additional information and images. Quote
hudomeld Posted Monday at 05:27 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 05:27 PM The blade has/had sashikomi polish.. but it looks like someone went on it again with some untraditional way aiming for the seen mirror like finish.. after that brought back the ha and hamon with kesho polishing... We will start now with the refreshing of the sashikomi polish.. and probably a mei investigation in the shinto, shinshinto era. Will see.. Many thanks for all your kind answers. Will keep you posted if anything nice or intresting comes up.. Regards David Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.