Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sadly, I no longer have the most cringeworthy tsuba I've ever seen.  It was unbelievably UGHHH and looked like a beginner's first attempt at an iron tsuba with a high relief blob that resembled a person.  This was very pre-Message Board and I almost wish I still had it to show here...

 

BaZZa.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Whilst I find the first two "masks" cringeworthy, I am very much taken by the two mempo designs - Eye of the beholder - define cringeworthy?

 

ugly times 2.jpgmempo tsuba.jpg

 

There would be plenty of cringeworthy subjects depicted on tsuba - I like this "Freddy Krueger" Daruma rendition. [The tsuba image is poor but I found a drawing of it, which is much clearer]

 

Freddy Krueger tsuba plus drawing 2.jpg

 

I can find a great many truly ugly "tsuba looking things" - ie. cast fakes for unwary tourists, but as Hamfish has made clear these would not really count as they are not really tsuba. [JMHO]

  • Like 3
Posted
14 hours ago, lonely panet said:

they arnt tsuba,  

its not a tsuba,  its a paperweight commemorating a event of something. do your homework,  it was never made to fit on a sword so its not a tsuba. 

 

Perhaps we should include tsuba-shaped or tsuba-like items that make one’s skin crawl. 

 

The tsuba-shaped paper weight I posted commemorates the Japanese Imperial Army occupation of Manchuria (1931-1945). It clearly has collecting value by the looks of that auction. 

 

As cringe worthy to me as this ash tray. 

 

Screenshot2025-03-21at11_54_14AM.thumb.jpeg.a7aac4c938affd14dd9e68d176e3bbd1.jpeg

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, Spartancrest said:

Plenty of cringeworthy subjects depicted on tsuba

Well they don't get much worse than this example from the British Museum - Not that it was ever a "real tsuba"  - [very ballsy!]

British balls.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
  • Confused 1
Posted

In reference to the original post, many on sites like eBay. There are exceptions and a nice tsuba doesn't have to be expensive for its' aesthetics to be appreciated in my opinion, but many on eBay are a bit cringeworthy.

  • Love 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Spartancrest said:

Do these count as cringeworthy? A collection of ten guards ruined so they could be strung together at someones whim - now in the National Gallery of Victoria [Australia]

pierced belt small.jpg

 

Why does the NGV keep these? Surely they could get their hands on superior pieces even before the butchery.....

Posted
37 minutes ago, Jake6500 said:

Why does the NGV keep these?

Jake, the NGV has 147 guards in its collection, they are all as far as I know, from a bequest [By "Felton"] donated between 1921 and a few in 1924. There are no "spectacular" pieces in the whole collection, about half are sukashi and very few famous names are recorded. I took the liberty of grouping four Australian museum collections and compiled a single catalogue of their contents as far as tsuba go [260 pages]. Would you like a PDF? It is not a publication that can be generally released as there are copyright issues but "research" should be ok. :)

  • Like 2
Posted

This is odd, I just checked the NGV website and found they have "up-dated" their information and images - now all the ura views have disappeared, which means my PDF has the only record of both sides - this in its own way is cringeworthy, a museum cutting its information available to the public! :freak:

 

[Well they weren't quick enough to fool me! :)]

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Wow 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

Museum's will keep those sorts of Tsuba if they are part of a fronds, or if they were of note to a well-enough-known individual... if this is the case, it is very unlikely they will ever be deaccessioned. Relatably, if a museum does not have a collections policy/collection direction for that type of historic item, they will not go out of their way to find better examples either. My local state museum is a prime example of this.

 

As for removing images, there are a few-to-many reasons for doing this... not usually for any untoward reasons... cases may include: updating digitisation efforts, management software upgrades, inadequate digital storage space... the list goes on.

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Spartancrest said:

Jake, the NGV has 147 guards in its collection, they are all as far as I know, from a bequest [By "Felton"] donated between 1921 and a few in 1924. There are no "spectacular" pieces in the whole collection, about half are sukashi and very few famous names are recorded. I took the liberty of grouping four Australian museum collections and compiled a single catalogue of their contents as far as tsuba go [260 pages]. Would you like a PDF? It is not a publication that can be generally released as there are copyright issues but "research" should be ok. :)

 

That would be great Dale!

 

Never turn down an opportunity to obtain new information!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...