Iaido dude Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 These can be tsuba you own or have seen elsewhere. Here’s one that inspired this thread. Enough said. https://www.jauce.com/auction/t1177198028 1 1 Quote
Bazza Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 Sadly, I no longer have the most cringeworthy tsuba I've ever seen. It was unbelievably UGHHH and looked like a beginner's first attempt at an iron tsuba with a high relief blob that resembled a person. This was very pre-Message Board and I almost wish I still had it to show here... BaZZa. 1 Quote
lonely panet Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 they arnt tsuba, 10 hours ago, Iaido dude said: These can be tsuba you own or have seen elsewhere. Here’s one that inspired this thread. Enough said. https://www.jauce.com/auction/t1177198028 its not a tsuba, its a paperweight commemorating a event of something. do your homework, it was never made to fit on a sword so its not a tsuba. Quote
Spartancrest Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 Whilst I find the first two "masks" cringeworthy, I am very much taken by the two mempo designs - Eye of the beholder - define cringeworthy? There would be plenty of cringeworthy subjects depicted on tsuba - I like this "Freddy Krueger" Daruma rendition. [The tsuba image is poor but I found a drawing of it, which is much clearer] I can find a great many truly ugly "tsuba looking things" - ie. cast fakes for unwary tourists, but as Hamfish has made clear these would not really count as they are not really tsuba. [JMHO] 3 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 It was Dale who posted this original vs fake comparison, still hilarious: 2 3 Quote
Iaido dude Posted March 21 Author Report Posted March 21 14 hours ago, lonely panet said: they arnt tsuba, its not a tsuba, its a paperweight commemorating a event of something. do your homework, it was never made to fit on a sword so its not a tsuba. Perhaps we should include tsuba-shaped or tsuba-like items that make one’s skin crawl. The tsuba-shaped paper weight I posted commemorates the Japanese Imperial Army occupation of Manchuria (1931-1945). It clearly has collecting value by the looks of that auction. As cringe worthy to me as this ash tray. Quote
Spartancrest Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 13 hours ago, PNSSHOGUN said: original vs fake comparison, still hilarious: Lots of these getting about - some much worse. 2 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 20 hours ago, Spartancrest said: Plenty of cringeworthy subjects depicted on tsuba Well they don't get much worse than this example from the British Museum - Not that it was ever a "real tsuba" - [very ballsy!] 1 7 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted Saturday at 07:09 AM Report Posted Saturday at 07:09 AM Do these count as cringeworthy? A collection of ten guards ruined so they could be strung together at someones whim - now in the National Gallery of Victoria [Australia] 1 1 Quote
Iaido dude Posted Saturday at 02:35 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 02:35 PM All highly cringeworthy. I do find it tragic to find an otherwise rare and desirable tsuba that has been severely damaged or purposely ruined. 1 Quote
Winchester Posted Saturday at 04:43 PM Report Posted Saturday at 04:43 PM In reference to the original post, many on sites like eBay. There are exceptions and a nice tsuba doesn't have to be expensive for its' aesthetics to be appreciated in my opinion, but many on eBay are a bit cringeworthy. 1 Quote
Jake6500 Posted Sunday at 03:09 AM Report Posted Sunday at 03:09 AM 19 hours ago, Spartancrest said: Do these count as cringeworthy? A collection of ten guards ruined so they could be strung together at someones whim - now in the National Gallery of Victoria [Australia] Why does the NGV keep these? Surely they could get their hands on superior pieces even before the butchery..... Quote
Spartancrest Posted Sunday at 03:46 AM Report Posted Sunday at 03:46 AM 37 minutes ago, Jake6500 said: Why does the NGV keep these? Jake, the NGV has 147 guards in its collection, they are all as far as I know, from a bequest [By "Felton"] donated between 1921 and a few in 1924. There are no "spectacular" pieces in the whole collection, about half are sukashi and very few famous names are recorded. I took the liberty of grouping four Australian museum collections and compiled a single catalogue of their contents as far as tsuba go [260 pages]. Would you like a PDF? It is not a publication that can be generally released as there are copyright issues but "research" should be ok. 2 Quote
Spartancrest Posted Sunday at 09:58 AM Report Posted Sunday at 09:58 AM This is odd, I just checked the NGV website and found they have "up-dated" their information and images - now all the ura views have disappeared, which means my PDF has the only record of both sides - this in its own way is cringeworthy, a museum cutting its information available to the public! [Well they weren't quick enough to fool me! ] 1 1 1 1 Quote
Steves87 Posted Sunday at 10:34 AM Report Posted Sunday at 10:34 AM Museum's will keep those sorts of Tsuba if they are part of a fronds, or if they were of note to a well-enough-known individual... if this is the case, it is very unlikely they will ever be deaccessioned. Relatably, if a museum does not have a collections policy/collection direction for that type of historic item, they will not go out of their way to find better examples either. My local state museum is a prime example of this. As for removing images, there are a few-to-many reasons for doing this... not usually for any untoward reasons... cases may include: updating digitisation efforts, management software upgrades, inadequate digital storage space... the list goes on. 2 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted Sunday at 01:05 PM Report Posted Sunday at 01:05 PM 2 hours ago, Steves87 said: fronds For those that don't know what a FRONDS is - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonds Not one of these 2 1 Quote
Jake6500 Posted Sunday at 03:24 PM Report Posted Sunday at 03:24 PM 11 hours ago, Spartancrest said: Jake, the NGV has 147 guards in its collection, they are all as far as I know, from a bequest [By "Felton"] donated between 1921 and a few in 1924. There are no "spectacular" pieces in the whole collection, about half are sukashi and very few famous names are recorded. I took the liberty of grouping four Australian museum collections and compiled a single catalogue of their contents as far as tsuba go [260 pages]. Would you like a PDF? It is not a publication that can be generally released as there are copyright issues but "research" should be ok. That would be great Dale! Never turn down an opportunity to obtain new information! Quote
Steves87 Posted Sunday at 09:29 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:29 PM 8 hours ago, Spartancrest said: For those that don't know what a FRONDS is - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonds Not one of these Haha, yes, auto correct 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.