TomP Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 Does anyone know how rare the "Gi" arsenal stamped blades are? A handful? Quite a few? I mostly run into the "showa" stamp, "seki" etc. I have come across this kind of stamp for the first time recently and was curious. Thanks for any help. Tom Quote
Bruno Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I think it replace the Seki and Showa stamp from 1943 and is found mostly on Murato swords.IMHO Quote
TomP Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Posted February 2, 2010 Thank you for the reply. From what I have read, the "Gi" (Gifu?) stamp came into being around mid-44 to the end of the war. My example that I have since picked up is dated December 1944. There is a tiny--from what looks to me--stamp on the other side of the tang that looks like Seki and yet another stamp of unknown design on the ridge of the tang. I read a description of just this type of tang in Gregory and Fuller's sword book: I think it is the Military Swords of Japan (?) the paperback (much less expensive!) reference book. Although the book states that a blade with this type of stamp is very rare, since the book was published 20+ years ago, does that still hold true? I would think several blades with this stamp would have "come out of the woodwork" so to speak since then. Thanks. Tom Quote
george trotter Posted February 3, 2010 Report Posted February 3, 2010 Hi Tom, I think it probably correct that more info has come out since F&G wrote their book. Personally I have seen the "Gi" stamp with some frequency...but only on tangs of "Type 3" mounted swords. These came out as Bruno says, in Nov? 1943 I think...there is an article you might have missed on this mark and type of sword, by Ohmura san...interesting. These marked swords seem to be mainly oil-quenched sunobe-to and the mark is put on by private contractors. try: http://www.h4.dion.ne.jp/~t-ohmura/gunto_118.htm It seems fairly common...but not nearly as common as SHO and SEKI stamps. Regards, George. Quote
Bruno Posted February 3, 2010 Report Posted February 3, 2010 This Ohmura san's article seems pretty interesting, I say "seems" because I really do not understand what it says! Probably because of my limited english but the translation is a bit weird, isn't it? Quote
TomP Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Posted February 3, 2010 Thanks to the both of you for the information. I will have to update my reference library big time! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.