Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Definitions seem to overlap so wondering if its more one than the other. My feeling is that uchigatana is more appropriate give the blades slender sugata

 

sugata2.thumb.jpg.242c36aab66d3570813c81c50a39813d.jpg

 

Nagasa:     62.3cm

Sori:   1.3cm

Motohaba: 2.57cm

Sakihaba:   1.61cm

Kasane at the mune:   0.57cm

Kasane at the shinogi: 0.72cm

Sakikasane: 0.46cm

Ko-Kissaki: 2.7cm

Posted

It's going to depend on the age of the blade - do you know when it dates to?

 

If koto, it might have been a katate uchi that got machi okuri to take a longer tsuka but the overall shape and patina on the tang tend to suggest a shinto blade to me at first blush, if it is, then it's just a short katana I think as uchigatana date to the period where the tachi rather than the katana were the primary weapon.

Posted

According to Nakayama, uchigatana started to appear from around 1429. This blade is Yamato Senjuin (possibly Senjuin Yoshihiro) from late Kamakura, early Nanbokucho. The nakago is over exposed and is much darker in hand. I'll post a pic later this evening.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

0-suriage, probably lost 10-15cm. All the pieces of the puzzle point to a shortened katana rather than an uchigatana from moment of manufacture. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Cannot say if it's suriage or not based on this unique photo but the sugata looks Kanbun shinto, it seems having a high shinogi which could lead to Mino or related school

Posted

It passed TH Senjuin in 2022. Attribution confirmed by Tanobe in the Sayagaki. Mino Senjuin would be recorded in the NBTHK attribution and quality of those blades is questionable. I've yet to see a mumei Mino Senjuin pass TH. 

Posted

Could it be an O-suriage tachi? Early Yamato den tachi can have a shallow sori toward the kissaki, and when suriage they can look pretty straight and slender.  

 

Here’s your sword over a couple ko-senjuin blades I found online.
 

Not my photos and I scaled to the best of my ability. I am not saying anything for certain, just proposing an Idea for food for thought. 

-Sam 

IMG_4548.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

IMHO it's a tachi cut down to a katana.

The overall shape, position of the 3 peg holes and the 'run-through' grooves all point to that. Finally, the tang would have been cut down much shorter if it was ever intended as uchigatana. And hey, why even bother when Mino and Bizen were churning them out in the thousands? This has been cut down way later to conform to katana standards.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...