Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

 

I am not a collector of Japanese shin Gunto, but found this and wondered if anyone would give me their opinion on whether you think if this is an original sword and if so helping with the Translation of the Mark on the Tang. Any help would be most appreciated.

IMG_3478.jpeg

IMG_3477.jpeg

IMG_3479.jpeg

IMG_3480.jpeg

IMG_3481.jpeg

IMG_3482.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks like an authentic SHOWA-TO by SEKI KANEMITSU (can't read the MEI properly, too small).

Your photos aren't bad, but you could improve on the technique. Making good photos of swords isn't easy and takes a lot of experience. Try to post images that are:
 

- well focused, not foggy or blurry
- made with a dark, non reflective background for good contrast
- made with light from the side (may not apply for HAMON photos)
- made directly from above (not at an angle)
- made with correct orientation (vertically tip-upwards, especially NAKAGO photos and TSUBA) 
- without HABAKI but showing the MACHI and NAKAGO JIRI 
- made in high resolution to see details
- showing details (in magnification) like BOSHI, HAMACHI, HAMON, HADA, NAKAGO JIRI etc. or the fine work on TSUBA
- presented as cut-outs so very little background is shown
 

If you cannot provide good photos (..."these photos are all I have from the dealer...."/..."I do not have a good camera but only an old mobile phone...." ), DO NOT POST BAD ONES. They will not be helpful.



 

  • Like 2
Posted

It's a genuine wartime made arsenal mass produced type sword. Oil quenched, with the arsenal stamp.
Kaneyoshi maybe?

Edit: Oops, Kanemitsu it is.

Posted

Duncan, Seki Goto Kanemitsu 関後藤兼光  he was a good smith, sho-sakura stamp is early war but looks a well made Showa-to blade. 

Some background and context in this paper:

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It kills me that they mostly didn't date the early war blades!  The showa stamp was used not by an arsenal, but by the civil organization called The Seki Cutlery Manufacturers Association, tasked to inspect showato for quality by the Seki area sword industry.  They used the stamp from 1935 to 1942.  While most of the dated blades are found to have been made in 1940-'41, your Type 94 fittings likely put the blade more in the 1935-1938 range.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for all the very useful information on this sword far more than I could have hoped for. Certainly interesting that you think this was a 1935-38 produced blade I did not think it was that early.

Posted
1 hour ago, ROKUJURO said:

Didier,

probably not OKUMURA KANEMITSU. I see that he used a different "KANE" KANJI.

Yes, Jean, this is what I had thought: try as I may, I couldn't get the kanji to match - they're a different hand altogether.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...