duncan2502 Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Hi I am not a collector of Japanese shin Gunto, but found this and wondered if anyone would give me their opinion on whether you think if this is an original sword and if so helping with the Translation of the Mark on the Tang. Any help would be most appreciated. 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Looks like an authentic SHOWA-TO by SEKI KANEMITSU (can't read the MEI properly, too small). Your photos aren't bad, but you could improve on the technique. Making good photos of swords isn't easy and takes a lot of experience. Try to post images that are: - well focused, not foggy or blurry - made with a dark, non reflective background for good contrast - made with light from the side (may not apply for HAMON photos) - made directly from above (not at an angle) - made with correct orientation (vertically tip-upwards, especially NAKAGO photos and TSUBA) - without HABAKI but showing the MACHI and NAKAGO JIRI - made in high resolution to see details - showing details (in magnification) like BOSHI, HAMACHI, HAMON, HADA, NAKAGO JIRI etc. or the fine work on TSUBA - presented as cut-outs so very little background is shown If you cannot provide good photos (..."these photos are all I have from the dealer...."/..."I do not have a good camera but only an old mobile phone...." ), DO NOT POST BAD ONES. They will not be helpful. 2 Quote
Brian Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 It's a genuine wartime made arsenal mass produced type sword. Oil quenched, with the arsenal stamp. Kaneyoshi maybe? Edit: Oops, Kanemitsu it is. Quote
duncan2502 Posted October 21, 2024 Author Report Posted October 21, 2024 Hi Thanks for the feedback here are some more images, I am having problems uploading the others, 2 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Jean is right, Kanemitsu 兼光. There were two Seki Kaji Tosho using that Kanji: 兼光 (Kanemitsu) - 後藤 松蔵 兼光 (Kanemitsu) - 小川 光雄 1 Quote
mecox Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Duncan, Seki Goto Kanemitsu 関後藤兼光 he was a good smith, sho-sakura stamp is early war but looks a well made Showa-to blade. Some background and context in this paper: 1 1 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Not to be confused with Kanemitsu 金光. 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 It kills me that they mostly didn't date the early war blades! The showa stamp was used not by an arsenal, but by the civil organization called The Seki Cutlery Manufacturers Association, tasked to inspect showato for quality by the Seki area sword industry. They used the stamp from 1935 to 1942. While most of the dated blades are found to have been made in 1940-'41, your Type 94 fittings likely put the blade more in the 1935-1938 range. 1 Quote
duncan2502 Posted October 21, 2024 Author Report Posted October 21, 2024 Thanks for all the very useful information on this sword far more than I could have hoped for. Certainly interesting that you think this was a 1935-38 produced blade I did not think it was that early. Quote
ROKUJURO Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 Didier, probably not OKUMURA KANEMITSU. I see that he used a different "KANE" KANJI. 1 Quote
Yukihiro Posted October 21, 2024 Report Posted October 21, 2024 On 10/21/2024 at 2:46 PM, ROKUJURO said: Didier, probably not OKUMURA KANEMITSU. I see that he used a different "KANE" KANJI. Expand Yes, Jean, this is what I had thought: try as I may, I couldn't get the kanji to match - they're a different hand altogether. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.