Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm just going to state what I think. I am sorry it will sound rough.

NBTHK holds Uda Kunimune in a bit higher regard than say Tomotsugu. If it writes Tomotsugu its late Muromachi, if its Kunimune it can be on the edge between Nanbokucho and Muromachi and generally hamon can have decent work in nie. One usually goes for TH to "confirm" its Nanbokucho. I don't want to check, lazy, but then you have Kunifusa which they give to good early Muromachi Uda with tight itame and there are  couple of other Muromachi names.

This being said in kantei they are all considered Muromachi by default and atari to each other.

 

This one is clearly late Muromachi, not Nanbokucho, so it has to be NTHK papers.

NTHK works differently in a sense they give a name + date so they can have anydate Kunimine - early, late etc..

Nevertheless, this example has very uncommon for Uda nakago, its hadamono with weak hamon suffocated by hadori. Late uda will have rough hada and coarse, nie based hamon.

I suspect this is post 2021 NTHK or NTHK NPO papers with a Strange Attribution.

Posted

I possibly see Enkyo, which would make it not a Meikan recorded smith.

It can be a shinto rather than Muromachi nakago.

In my impression shinto's Uda were a generic shinto style smiths:

https://www.aoijapan...katana-uda-kunimune/

but possibly the meaning behind the papers is that some continued to imitate the Muromachi style. In which case its actually an interesting attribution.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...