Jump to content

Translation please


Recommended Posts

I would like to see pictures of the whole sword please. I could be wrong of course, and hopefully am, but to my eyes this seems more like a Chinese copy than a genuine Japanese blade.:dunno:The shape and finish of the nakago, the very badly written and lightly inscribed kanji, the megugi ana etc. Several things do not seem right to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes! Excellent! They do not fake the W stamp. The blade is legitimate, I see nothing wrong with the fittings as legitimate World War II fittings. There is a mystery with the fuchi and tsuba.  Both are World War III items, but they seem mismatched. Whether that was done during the war or after no one can know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Kyle68 said:

 it appears primarily on Takehisa, Yoshiharu and the Mantetsu blades. Is that correct?

Yes, primarily.  I have single examples of the stamp on Haruhisa, Tenshin, and Kanenori blades, but 13-14 examples on Takehisa and Yoshiharu blades and 26 examples on Mantetsu.  I do have a few examples on Type 19s and Type 95s as well.

 

The dated blades from the smiths are all 1943 - 1945.  The Matetsu range from 1942 - 1944.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...