Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

 

Can you help me with this one?

The smith should be BISHU OSAFUNE KATSUMITSU, and the sword should be forged in EISHO 7.

What doues the rest say?

 

Best regards

IMG_9856.jpg

Posted

Perhaps the seller was indicating a representative time period he believes this smith worked (there were several Katsumitsu in the lineage), but from what I can see in the paper this sword does not have a specific date inscribed. 

 

Best regards, 

Ray

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, other side is:

Eisho

7

Nengo (year)

2

Gattsu (month)

Hi (day)

 

Roughly, “A day in February in the 7th year of Eisho”.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Your paper is not NBTHK’s paper, though it imitates the style of NBTHK. It was issued by 美術日本刀保存審査會 (Bijutsu Nihonto Hozon Shinsakai) in 1974.

  • Like 4
Posted
13 minutes ago, Mark S. said:

Yes, other side is:

Eisho

7

Nengo (year)

2

Gattsu (month)

Hi (day)

 

Roughly, “A day in February in the 7th year of Eisho”.

 

Thanks :)

 

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...