Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Generally speaking, when a katana is o-suriage and the first craftsman's signature has therefore completely disappeared (assuming it existed) but there is that of whoever (I presume) carried out the cutting-shortening operation of the blade in the Edo era. .how much should the signature of the "swordsmith-shortener" be taken into consideration (in terms of the importance of the blade)?

 

Posted

When a sword has been shortened and there is a komei inscription ( indicating what the previous inscription was), the stated attribution is not taken at face value. It's only upheld by the shinsa team if the characteristics of the sword itself align with that attribution. For example, a nakago inscription of komei Norishige Tadatsuna suriageru would not receive NBTHK papers if the blade looked like a Nagayama Ikkansai Yoshihiro rather than a Norishige. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...