Justin Posted May 30, 2024 Report Posted May 30, 2024 Hi everyone, Hope you’re having a great day. i submitted the below tsuba to shinsa recently and it received Tokubetsu Hozon with a ‘Heianjo Zogan’ attribution. I thought it might come back as Yoshiro (or more optimistically Yoshiro Naomasa). https://tosogucollec...heianjo-zogan-tsuba/ I know Yoshiro is a branch of Heianjo, however would there be a reason the NBTHK stopped at just Heianjo? Thanks in advance for any feedback. Justin 5 1 Quote
zanilu Posted May 30, 2024 Report Posted May 30, 2024 It looks like the essence of Kaga Yoshiro. A manual piece! But what do I know... Regards Luca 3 Quote
Justin Posted May 30, 2024 Author Report Posted May 30, 2024 Thanks Luca. I noticed this tsuba for sale with a paper from 2016. This says Yoshiro. i see my tsuba as more ‘Yoshiro’ compared to this one. Perhaps NBTHK has had a change of policy and only assign Heianjo Zogan now? 5 Quote
zanilu Posted May 31, 2024 Report Posted May 31, 2024 I am lost! I have collected many Yoshiro pieces example here: I have always found frustrating the fact that NBTHK does not provide justification, reasons and references the leader to an attribution. To me the shinsa process is rather opaque! Regards Luca 2 1 Quote
Soshin Posted May 31, 2024 Report Posted May 31, 2024 On 5/31/2024 at 10:13 AM, zanilu said: I have always found frustrating the fact that NBTHK does not provide justification, reasons and references the leader to an attribution. To me the shinsa process is rather opaque! Expand It is an appraisal paper not a research paper or any other type of academic document. This is not a realistic expectation for any appraisal system. Does the PCGS or NGC do this with every coin they grade? Quote
zanilu Posted May 31, 2024 Report Posted May 31, 2024 David I agree that it should not be an achademic paper but the criteria used should be given at least... Regards Luca 1 Quote
Ed Posted May 31, 2024 Report Posted May 31, 2024 This kind of attribution is common these days. From what I understand it is a multi faceted problem. Older shinsa team members have passed on or retired. Newer members are not knowledgeable enough to be confident in more specific attributions. They err on the side of safety. Same with swords, just look at the results of last years juyo shinsa, 80% fail rate if memory serves me. 2 Quote
MauroP Posted May 31, 2024 Report Posted May 31, 2024 Quote To me the shinsa process is rather opaque! Expand Luca, stai parlando male di Garibaldi! (it's an Italian idiomatic expression to say that some opinions cannot be challenged even if overtly misleading) 3 1 Quote
Ed Posted June 1, 2024 Report Posted June 1, 2024 On 5/31/2024 at 4:20 PM, MauroP said: it's an Italian idiomatic expression to say that some opinions cannot be challenged even if overtly misleading Expand Mauro, That is not entirely true. When I co-owned my small shop in Fukuoka there several times when we disagreed with an NBTHK attribution. My partner who was Japanese went to the NBTHK and confronted them about their attribution. Of course he went armed with documentation to support our opinion, but every time their decision was changed in our favor. I always felt it was due to them being overwhelmed with the volume of swords they were required to judge in such a short period of time. They simple do not have time to do proper research on the swords which require more time. You have probably seen a shinsa outside Japan, it is conveyer belt style with each sword receiving 1-2 minutes of judgement. If not textbook perfect, it gets bounced. 3 Quote
zanilu Posted June 1, 2024 Report Posted June 1, 2024 On 5/31/2024 at 4:20 PM, MauroP said: Quote To me the shinsa process is rather opaque! Expand Luca, stai parlando male di Garibaldi! (it's an Italian idiomatic expression to say that some opinions cannot be challenged even if overtly misleading) Expand I know Mauro. But this case "Chiede vendetta" (calls for vengeance)! Regards Luca Quote
MauroP Posted June 1, 2024 Report Posted June 1, 2024 All right folks, first of all I want to assure that no intended disrespect to NBTHK shinsa activity from me. Simply I feel sometime confortable in expressing a different opinion. Here below another tsuba attributed to Heianjō-zōgan, showing a quite typical decoration with ranma-sukashi usually associated with Yoshirō-zōgan tsuba. I fully agree with Luca when he says that the tsuba we are dealing about is a "manual piece". Indeed here below the tsuba submitted by Justin paired with a very close example described as Yoshirō, taken from "Tanoshi Shinchū Zōgan Tsuba: 100 Tsuba" by Ōtani Sadao. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.