den70 Posted May 10, 2024 Report Posted May 10, 2024 Gentlemen, please tell the wakizashi about this. thank you for your help. I was told that the blacksmith is Kanetsugu from the 16th century. But I would like to know your authoritative opinion on the blade, koshirae and tsuba. Thanks. Quote
2devnul Posted May 10, 2024 Report Posted May 10, 2024 Hello, I think you should post better pictures. There is a guide on forum on how to take pictures of Nihonto. From top of my head I can advise you on getting full Sugata picture of sword facing Kissaki top and Nakago down. Close-up pictures of Kissaki, Nakago, Hamon, Hada, Boshi will also help. What is Nagasa measure of that blade? Quote
ROKUJURO Posted May 10, 2024 Report Posted May 10, 2024 Den, as Adam wrote, better photos would help: Dark background, well focused, photos taken directly from above. As far as the TSUBA is concerned, on the photos, it looks cast (besides the rust damage), so no collecting value. Quote
Rivkin Posted May 11, 2024 Report Posted May 11, 2024 Not much is seen here and I don't want to check books, but: It looks like genuine Mino end of Muromachi blade, and I would take the signature as authentic. Early Edo is a possibility, but without checking different generations of this smith I would still believe its end Muromachi. Saya and tsuka are not a match. Saya looks like mid-upper grade lacquer work that would do well with Namban motifs or dragons and tsuka/tsuba might be from a different opera, as per Russian saying. Tsuba is crudely executed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.