Rodenbacher Posted March 24, 2024 Report Posted March 24, 2024 Gentlemen, I need your help! Some years ago I bought this Tsuba, it was not expensive, but when I held it in my hands, I was really disappointed. At first I thought it was a casted copy, but after some time of studying I can guarantee, it's not. What puzzles me is the strange surface. It's smooth, but there are irregularities I have never seen on a Tsuba before. I don't know, what it is? Remnants of old lacquer? Old paint? A rather bad repatination? 1 Quote
Rodenbacher Posted March 24, 2024 Author Report Posted March 24, 2024 Close-ups show the irregularities: Quote
Rodenbacher Posted March 24, 2024 Author Report Posted March 24, 2024 There is at least one of the irregularities, which is clearly a Tekkotsu - it's very difficult to take a photo of it, but it has the color of Iron, so it's no paint or lacquer: Quote
Rodenbacher Posted March 24, 2024 Author Report Posted March 24, 2024 Or am I completely mistaken and it's cast? There are no bubbles in the surface, the Sukashi walls show no seams of the casting moulds, the iron rings like a bell, when snapped with a fingernail... I really need your advice. Quote
Teimei Posted March 24, 2024 Report Posted March 24, 2024 Hi Peter, maybe some kind of fire damage / corrosion problem in the past? Quote
Brian Posted March 24, 2024 Report Posted March 24, 2024 I could be wrong, but looks ok to me. A legit old piece. I don't think tsuba like this were made to be perfectly flat, the imperfections add to the character. 4 1 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted March 25, 2024 Report Posted March 25, 2024 Liking the tsuba design. I would go with a couple of your earlier ideas. Much (but not all) of that reminds me of iron kabuto etc., where the lacquer has been subsequently removed. 1 Quote
goo Posted March 28, 2024 Report Posted March 28, 2024 I think its old and the combination of age and perhaps not having been cared for properly during its lifespan before you acquired it have caused the surface and grain in the iron to lift and separate who knows where its been or what its been through. I think you have a great piece. 1 Quote
Rodenbacher Posted March 28, 2024 Author Report Posted March 28, 2024 Thanks to all of you for your help and your kind words. Quote
Curran Posted March 28, 2024 Report Posted March 28, 2024 Legit tsuba. From the picture of inside the sukashi, I'd guess it to be repatinated. Probably it had condition issues that were cleaned up, and then repatinated. Take this as the devil's word, but many tsuba are repatinated. Some are incredibly well done. Others are a bit more "dipped". Believe it or not, many repatinated tsuba get NBTHK papers. Guido S. would insist it was only to Hozon in the past and No Longer Done according to his NBTHK sources, but I then watched tsuba I know to have been repatinated go on to get Hozon despite Guido's opinion. Repatinations at Tokubetsu Hozon or Juyo? Mmmm. Some exist. I had one with TH papers that I learned was repatinated. I also know of at least two Juyo that were repaired and repatinated. I had the pleasure of seeing the before, after, and after Juyo pics. I'm sorry that Guido isn't around to disagree with me. 3 2 Quote
Tim Evans Posted April 5, 2024 Report Posted April 5, 2024 This odd surface looks like it may be from this Japanese tsuba smith. His site is worth checking periodically so you know what the reproductions look like. See the top left image for the odd surface. http://tsubaryuken.com/sono2.html 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted April 5, 2024 Report Posted April 5, 2024 3 hours ago, Tim Evans said: Japanese tsuba smith This back yard smith with his production line of oily looking strange surfaced 'look a likes' https://www.jauce.com/user/dj2hmyuc some over on ebay as well https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/386180771020 being sold now by other dealers. Quote
Rodenbacher Posted April 7, 2024 Author Report Posted April 7, 2024 On 4/5/2024 at 2:18 AM, Tim Evans said: This odd surface looks like it may be from this Japanese tsuba smith. His site is worth checking periodically so you know what the reproductions look like. See the top left image for the odd surface. http://tsubaryuken.com/sono2.html I can see the similarities, but I can also see the differences in the two Tsuba surfaces. I don't think it's the same maker. Quote
Rodenbacher Posted April 8, 2024 Author Report Posted April 8, 2024 9 hours ago, ROKUJURO said: To me, it looks like a new TSUBA. What is the reason for your opinion? I think it would help all of us if you could tell us a bit more. In fact I am really in doubt about the age of this piece and it would help a lot if I could understand your point of view. Quote
ROKUJURO Posted April 8, 2024 Report Posted April 8, 2024 With pleasure, when I have a bit more time. Actually, I am on the road, travelling home from northern Germany. 1 Quote
Rodenbacher Posted April 8, 2024 Author Report Posted April 8, 2024 3 hours ago, ROKUJURO said: With pleasure, when I have a bit more time. Actually, I am on the road, travelling home from northern Germany. Just visit me in Frankfurt, so we can meet and you can hold my Tsuba in your hands! Quote
ROKUJURO Posted April 8, 2024 Report Posted April 8, 2024 Peter, I like the general design idea of your TSUBA. What puzzles me are some details: The NAKAGO ANA is not symmetrical, and as all TSUBA masters have a good eye for balance and symmetry, this does not really fit for me. The SEKIGANE are barely fiting into the NAKAGO ANA on one side while they go far into the SEPPA DAI on the other side where they have been pounded flat. In my eyes, this is not elegant and often seen in amateur TSUBA. Also, the bird's tail is not symmetrical. Furthermore, the pronounced TSUCHI ME (visible in photo # 4) is unusual for an older TSUBA, I think. The TEKKOTSU (or what is probably meant to be TEKKOTSU) is strange in my eyes. They look like traces of welding to me. Finally, the head of the crane does not look elegant to me. I may well be wrong on all points, so I would really like to see this TSUBA in hand. 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted April 9, 2024 Report Posted April 9, 2024 Several years back I showed a tsuba that was dismissed as not being done by a master craftsman as "No smith would make a seppa-dai so obviously lopsided". However the human eye is not infallible and when I tried simple geometry the discrepancy is minute and most of the off-center look is from the kogai hitsu-ana. Some designs look better with a free hand approach and not rigid symmetry. We should also judge design and symmetry from how the piece would look mounted, that after all is the purpose and intent. JMO 3 1 Quote
Rodenbacher Posted April 9, 2024 Author Report Posted April 9, 2024 Thank you both! The Nakago-ana was altered heavily, so it's difficult to judge, if the artist was bad or another smith who altered it. The tail of the bird is not symmetrical, that's right - and the head of the bird isn't very elegant done, these are good points, Jean! But the best argument you mentioned is the strange form of what I called Tekkotsu. I own some Tsuba (Ko-Shoami, Kanayama etc) with real Tekkotsu and they look indeed different. And that's exactly, what concerns me.... 1 Quote
OceanoNox Posted April 9, 2024 Report Posted April 9, 2024 5 hours ago, Spartancrest said: We should also judge design and symmetry from how the piece would look mounted, that after all is the purpose and intent. A very good point, too often forgotten! 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.