Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, I’m a newbie to NMB and tsuba collecting and appreciation. I practice iaido, which naturally grew into an interest in nihonto. I wonder what you folks think of this sukashi tsuba with hakogaki by Sasano indicating it is Kinai middle Edo. It doesn’t look like the work of the Kinai school from what my on-line research has gleaned. I have long been wondering about the meaning of  symbols at 12 and 6, and at 3 and 9 o’clock. Could they be aoi leaves alternating with aoi buds? Life, death, rebirth. I imagine a samurai running or riding into battle would take comfort in knowing that life and death are not separate.50247BEE-C781-4905-82D8-43CB882DA99F.thumb.jpeg.0beb4cbdfd66b3c701db818c544f016f.jpegF9DA1431-6A4E-455F-BD38-E6E7F5A3E498.thumb.jpeg.1e7436ef9967e8cc52e427502066dc98.jpegD3E6D834-39E8-4E78-BBF1-A199E4E480A5.thumb.jpeg.78440a5a8129b0431d61725672e53cf8.jpeg

  • Like 8
Posted

Thanks. Artur Drogamiecza from whom I just received a nice sukashi just let me know that “Kinai” was never a part of the hakogaki. And aoi (hollyhock) is in fact mentioned by Sasano sensei. Mystery solved! I’m just simply astounded at how bad the translation is that came with this sukashi. I definitely need to learn Japanese. Artur thinks it belongs to the Owari or second Shoami school. If my interpretation is correct then the movement often mentioned in relation to at least the ko Shoami can be appreciated as one follows the “leaf-bud-leaf-bud” arrangement whether clockwise or counterclockwise. 

Posted

"Kinai" is written on the outside of the lid. It isn't shown in this picture. (I have seen this box before). 

 

I wouldn't like to argue with Sasano sensei, but you may get another attribution if you sent this to shinsa today. 

Posted

I’m traveling at the moment. I’ll post the pic of lid when I return, but I’m sure you are correct. The seller is not someone whom I would have guessed could make this kind of mistake. Honestly though, it doesn’t much matter to me what attribution is correct. My enjoyment and appreciation has increased immensely. Thanks for your sharing your expertise and for your suggestions. 

Posted

This is the box  cover next to tsuba.It’s darker than the prior images suggest (photography with artificial lighting). It certainly says kinai. The calligraphy style is unmistakably that of sensei. 24CE6EC2-1FC7-414F-8BFF-68ED76C5980F.thumb.jpeg.07f3237cfb4594ac748304fe86e29315.jpeg

7F8BC60D-25B8-453D-A3D5-DF069A8C2332.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

quite interesting!

I was re-reading a few Haynes articles to kill some time while the outside temps are 42 degc, and came across this article which has some relation to the thread: Haynes Article (shibuiswords.com) being from 1997, I found the quoted pricing also quite interesting.

Edited by Steves87
added
  • Love 1
Posted

This is a kinai sukashi that is less cluttered and elaborate. Apparently there were artisans of this school who could have produced my sukashi possibly incorporating ko-shoami and owari elements. The iron plate of my sukashi was carefully carved, the rim squared, and the surface is smooth without tekkotsu typical of the middle edo period. BTW, please correct me if I’m talking garbage. 

4044F55A-DCBC-4A79-8605-08A14ED26A1D.thumb.jpeg.ae0dba38f407c8d0f51e090c7972d1a5.jpeg

Posted

Stephen’s link is an interesting description and commentary on primarily kamakura iron plates sold in auction. Interesting insight into the Sasano collection pieces now in a museum in Japan. Pieces with Hakogaki by Sasano and sold in the west may not be  “museum quality,” but then again tsuba like mine hold an interest nonetheless and are not fakes or outright imitations. I saw a sukashi from Sasano’s silver book (plate 134) offered from a private collection in the west being offered for $10,000 because it is a “Japanese national treasure.” It is impressive. I would have to sell one of my vintage Gibson Les Paul guitars to acquire it (I am tempted). My kinai sukashi cannot compare, but I just really enjoy and appreciate it. I do feel a kinship with sensei when I look at his seals on the hakogaki. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Interestingly the triple aoi is the mon of the Takagowa clan and that of the last shogunate. There is some reference to aoi in Japanese culture as symbolizing abundance (as in harvest) and good fortune, warding off thunderstorms and earthquakes, and death and rebirth (may be more a western tradition). 

 

https://en.m.wikiped...g/wiki/Tokugawa_clan

https://art.thewalte...hock-crests-aoi-mon/

Posted
On 2/5/2024 at 9:11 PM, Iaido dude said:

Artur thinks it belongs to the Owari or second Shoami school.

 

Nice tsuba. Looking at how the sukashi design was done, I think this tsuba is clearly the work of Shoami School. The Owari group never used (nikubori ji-sukashi 肉彫地透かし) technique in their openwork designs. It was a common technique used by the many Shoami schools located all over Japan during the Edo Period.

 

I also agree the Kinai School attribution is not accurate from what I know of the school's work.      

Posted

The aoi are carved in high relief with a sense of motion as they twist (not done in just one dimension). So, I agree with David’s comment about the Shoami school’s use of nikubori ji-sukashi technique. That really brings it all together nicely. I wonder if the lid got swapped from another or it’s simply in error. 

 

I think there is a part of the hakogaki that references “June 1991 Honorable Mention, Mumei, Middle Edo Worker, Aoi.” Was Sasano indicating that this tsuba was in some way a submission for a contest? Translation by Translate Go app may be in error, but it is very specific. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It says

 

葵透

無銘 江戸中期作

鉄地透

清勁平明 佳作

平成二年水無月

素心鑑(印)

 

Aoi Sukashi

Unsigned, mid-Edo period.

Iron, sukashi

Clear, strong, and unpretentious. Fine work.

June, 1990

Soshinkan (Sasano's art name) 

 

"Fine Work" is the lowest grade of Sasano's three-tier grading system. Fine → Superb → Masterpiece. Lowest doesn't mean bad in his case. He wouldn't have bothered writing a hakogaki for a bad tsuba.

 

If I remember the price correctly, and given that we are several decades past the time when Haynes was discussing, you don't need to worry about having overpaid for the piece. This is a good work, and the price was good, and regardless of the attribution on the box, both tsuba and box are nice things to have. 

 

Check out the site below for even more information. The author of that site (I think he is a poster here as well) translates 佳作 as "Beautiful Work" which is a good translation as well. 佳 literally means "beautiful" or "good".  Forget about "honorable mention". Machine translation often barfs up misleading translations.

 

https://tsubakansho....sano-senseis-grades/

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks so much. This was very helpful. I don’t for a second believe I overpaid for this piece (only my 2nd sukashi tsuba). Indeed, I feel it is a great value to me at $800. The provenance just enhances the appreciation and understanding of the piece. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 2/10/2024 at 8:50 AM, Iaido dude said:

I wonder if the lid got swapped from another or it’s simply in error. 

 

That is a possibility. I have gotten and seen some old boxes with mismatched lids or replacement lids before.   

Posted

Doesn’t make sense either. The hakogaki description inside lid is correct. The “kinai” on outside of lid not correct it would seem. That seems to be a mistake. 

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...