Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From what I have understood, Amahide(天秀), whose civilian name was Fukumoto Hideyoshi (福本秀吉), had a workshop or factory where several gunsmiths were at work so that there is little chance that this blade, although signed with his name, was by his hand.

 

I would say this sword exhibits typical Showa-to characteristics save for the mon which was affixed to its tsuka and the rather elaborate sarute. One of the eight seppa is missing and the saya was rather badly damaged at some point. The Seki stamp is clearly visible, so there is no doubt this is not a gendai-to.

 

I would tend to think the ito is not the WW2 original one but would need the opinion of the more knowledgeable forum members to confirm that. Other than that, I would be interested to know whether the number (?) painted in yellow on the nakago does tally with the numbered parts of the koshirae. My first impression is that it doesn't, so maybe the koshirae is not quite original to the blade.

IMG_6453-1024x269.jpg

IMG_6454-1024x243.jpg

IMG_6567-1024x279.jpg

IMG_6591-1024x613.jpg

IMG_6627-1024x579.jpg

IMG_6637-1024x377.jpg

IMG_6643-1024x331.jpg

IMG_6651-1024x334.jpg

IMG_6681-1024x330.jpg

IMG_6684-1024x909.jpg

IMG_6687-717x1024.jpg

IMG_6690-1024x262.jpg

IMG_6694-550x1024.jpg

IMG_6467-1024x336.jpg

IMG_6522-1024x367.jpg

IMG_6474-972x1024.jpg

IMG_6481-787x1024.jpg

IMG_6486-1024x458.jpg

IMG_6526-1024x981.jpg

IMG_6662-1024x768.jpg

IMG_6665-1024x682.jpg

IMG_6670-1024x820.jpg

IMG_6674-1024x948.jpg

IMG_6676-887x1024.jpg

IMG_6588-1024x307.jpg

IMG_6590-1024x273.jpg

IMG_6597-1024x261.jpg

IMG_6614-1024x476.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

From what I understood, the numbers painted on the nakago usually never match the ones on the fittings. 

 

If your sword fits inside the koshirae, it has to be original. Each sword being unique, it's almost impossible to find another koshirae for a given sword.

 

Very nice pictures :thumbsup:

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, francois2605 said:

From what I understood, the numbers painted on the nakago usually never match the ones on the fittings. 

 

If your sword fits inside the koshirae, it has to be original. Each sword being unique, it's almost impossible to find another koshirae for a given sword.

 

Very nice pictures :thumbsup:

The pictures aren't mine: they're the seller's, actually. I shall try to take closer views of the blade when I receive the gunto, though.

Posted

Some more information about Fukumoto Amahide's production:

post-1134-14196872860761.jpg

 

Cabowen explained the phrase daisaku daimei : "daisaku means made by a student for the master and daimei means signed with the master's name with his permission by his student. Thus, a daisaku daimei blade is a work made entirely by a student in his master's place...." (https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/8258-assastince-please/#comment-83023)

 

post-21-14196773416057.jpg

Posted

Hi Didier,

 

The date is 1941, and the mei is a good match for the one in Slough where he contends it is daimei for Kanemune.  I have another Amahide with a 4 character mei, so Slough may be right.

 

Slough's example                                          An actual

Screenshot2020-12-11215923.jpg.e2904f0029487bf0d4d6dd7415faf22a.jpg   image_1014410.thumb.jpg.934e827b1b90064efd2eba201f9156b5.jpg

 

I see nothing to indicate the ito isn't original, in fact, it shows wear and tear I would consider WWII legit.

 

While the painted number is pretty rough, it very well could be a sloppy "10".  I thought at first it was a "14", but it could be a 10.  I differ with Francois, in that original fittings quite often have matching numbers.  Now, there are plenty, and I mean plenty, of gunto with non-matching numbers.  Even gunto with 2 different painted numbers.  So, those could have been wartime re-fits, or post-war piece-togethers, but the fully complete, original gunto, when found in pristine condition (just see some of IJASWORDS examples) all have matching numbers.

 

The hamon does seem to have the telltale dark peaks that would indicate an oil quench.  But, typical of large seki stamped blades, it is a good looking blade and a good looking gunto.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

The mon was identified as Daki Omodaka (抱面高), but I am at a loss as to the family or families it might stand for.

IMG_6481-787x1024.jpg

The only information I have found so far is that the Daki Omodaka mon was used by the Mōri clan (毛利氏) that governed over the Chōshū Domain (長州藩) from 1600 to 1871.

Posted

Note that omodaka may also be spelled 沢瀉. Associated families are: 

 

Shiina, Someda/Yanada, Mori, Kinoshita, Asano, Sakai, Horikoshi, Mizuno, Tsuchii, Fukushima, etc...

椎名、梁田、毛利、木下、浅野、酒井、堀越、沢井、水野、土井、福島など

 

 

More information (in Japanese) here at the linked page

https://irohakamon.c...kagedakiomodaka.html

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Here is a short video showing the blade, which has a nice polish (maybe too nice a polish, from my point of view :doubt:) -->

Amahide gunto blade

 

IMG20240205163558.jpg

 

From the instances of his work I have been able to see so far, my impression is that Fukumoto Kanemune's gunome is more flamboyant than this one, so maybe Kanemune had nothing to do with this blade after all.

 

Kissaki_Fukutomo_Kanemune.JPG

 

 

$_3-5.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The mei looks the same to me.  Sesko only lists 1 Showa era Amahide, but that doesn't mean there weren't more of them during the war.  

 

Isn't "Ichimongi" one of those honorary titles smiths sometimes gave themselves?  Or a "tip 'o the hat" to the Ichimongi school of swordmaking?

Posted

Actually I had, Mal, and I assume the reason why Amahide's production is so well documented is because it was indeed much more complex than meets the eye (literally!). From what I have understood so far, my blade might have been made by Fukumoto Kanemune, Amahide's son-in-law and adopted son, but, as a matter of fact, I find Kanemune's style more flamboyant than the one my sword exhibits, which is, at least from my layman's point of view, of a much more "classical" gunto style.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

These are actually the very first pictures of the blade I was able to take in broad daylight (no sunlight, though):

 

 

IMG001.jpg

IMG002.jpg

IMG003.jpg

IMG004.jpg

IMG005.jpg

 

I can't tell whether my Amahide blade is low or medium grade Shôwatô, but it doesn't look too bad in the light of day.

 

The "scratch pattern" on the blade is not visible to the naked eye for the most part, so I suppose the way I took some of the photos must have had something to do with it.

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Yukihiro said:

 

I can't tell whether my Amahide blade is low or medium grade Shôwatô, but it doesn't look too bad in the light of day.

looks like it needs a polish, or?

Posted

The blade does have some scratches and stains here and there, but, other than that, the (wartime?) polish looks good to me (as good as an original WW2 polish can possibly be, I mean! ;)).

 

IMG20240218141559.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Stephen said:

OLI, Why would you have it polished?

 

Waste of time and money IMHO

 

Yes i think you are right, sorry

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Why do you say that looks fine to me.

Because, in the first place, I thought that the polish might have been revamped after WW2, but it turned out that I was wrong.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Stephen said:

No need to say sorry it's a learning process. 

 

 

My view on the subject is that hoping to improve the polish of Showato blades is a lost cause - to be sure, there are those who improve them visually by polishing the blades mechanically and/or acid etching them, but by so doing they take away some of their historical value. That is the reason why I wanted a gunto blade with a decent polish: gunto blades should be taken as they are and for what they are.

  • Like 1
Posted

Are you talking about the Aoijapan blade or Didier's blade?

Guys may correct me, but the Aoi blade is described as: 

Jigane :Niedeki suguha with small ashi and Kinsuji work.
Bo-shi is rather long and hamon is komaru.
Hamon :Nie deki suguha based koala well work and kinsuji work.

 

I don't think oil quenched blades have those details.  

 

 

  • Like 1
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...