New Sword

[Aethel_berht]

Hello! I recently obtained a Katana and was wondering if anyone had any information to spare on it. It is signed as Hirokuni from Bushu. I believe it is a Shinto Era blade. 

[Mark S.]

I mis-read mei… 

[Bruce Pennington]

Hello "A"!  Looks like you got the NMB name posting rule backwards.  Folks don't care about our last names, but we like to have a real first name to chat with.

 

Gorgeous blade.  Looks like it has some potential!

[Aethel_berht]

1 hour ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Hello "A"!  Looks like you got the NMB name posting rule backwards.  Folks don't care about our last names, but we like to have a real first name to chat with.

 

Gorgeous blade.  Looks like it has some potential!

Alright I'll get that name thing cleared soon.

 

I'm potentially looking to have the blade polished by a togishi. Do you think that this blade would be worth polishing and if so do you know any togishi I can contact? Any information would be very helpful!

[vajo]

Sorry i read 

Bushu ju Hirokuni saku

 

Hirokuni makes no sense ... i fail. 

[Bruce Pennington]

1 hour ago, vajo said:

Sorry i read 

Bushu ju Hirokuni saku

 

Hirokuni makes no sense ... i fail. 

I checked Sesko's list.  He shows "HIRO (広・廣)" so the 廣 could be used for "Hiro"; yet he doesn't show any smiths using 廣 国.  

 

@mecox?

[rebcannonshooter]

Hawley's lists a "Hirokuni" with this "Hiro" kanji. He was the second generation and signed  "Bushu ju Hirokuni saku", worked circa 1688.

Hope this helps.   

Tom M.

[mecox]

Bruce, Chris is right   Bushu ju Hirokuni saku

[Rivkin]

By shape its circa 1650-1660, or maybe 1690-1720, plus minus. Looks reasonably legit. Polish is unlikely to be profitable.