wakiboy Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 Dear members A friend asked me to read a Mei for him which he was struggling with. I read this as “Ju Toeizan Shinobigaoka no Hotori Ko Nyudo” which I believe is a late Mei of Kotetsu. Unfortunately I am unable to find any examples of this Mei. On studying the Mei it appears to be very thickly struck but most of the Kotetsu Mei I found are thinner in comparison. is there a possibility that this is a “Kajihei” fake? Any information is appreciated. Many thanks Ian Quote
Ray Singer Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 I don't know that Kajihei is responsible, but this does not appear to be an authentic inscription for Kotetsu. Best regards, Ray 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 I have several cut test mei of Hisahide, over 3 decades, and the kao on this one is pretty crude in comparison and innaccurate in places. 1668 1675 1686 Quote
DoTanuki yokai Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 I think most kajihei works simply paper as what he tried to copy Quote
ckaiserca Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 3 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said: I have several cut test mei of Hisahide, over 3 decades, and the kao on this one is pretty crude in comparison and innaccurate in places. I was thinking that it looked like someone went at that Nakago with a gold paint marker... Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 9 minutes ago, ckaiserca said: gold paint marker.. Oh, I think you're right! The horizontal lines in the gold kanji match up with the horizontal yasurime! Quote
vajo Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 Charles and Bruce are right. Its painted. incredible. Btw: Bruce the yasurime lines are ok when you see it in the inscription. The inscription is made after the yasurime. The round edges is the point what makes me nervous. Her is an original cutting test signature. you can see the difference and the parts where the gold falls out. Quote
DoTanuki yokai Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 It’s inlaid and filed on surface level with the Nakago, what is normal. the picture shows that some of the inlay fell out 1 1 Quote
Jacques Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 No need to check oshigata, this mei is a bad counterfeit which makes the Kajihei option invalid. 1 Quote
wakiboy Posted November 7, 2023 Author Report Posted November 7, 2023 Thanks everyone for your opinions, does anyone know of any pictures/oshigata for the Mei “Ko Nyudo” as mentioned in Sesko’s book? Ian Quote
Nobody Posted November 7, 2023 Report Posted November 7, 2023 Ref. 山田浅右衛門佩刀 虎徹と清麿展出品 乕徹大鑑等所載品 長曽禰乕徹 住東叡山忍岡邊虎入道Nagasone Kotetsu Jyu Toeizan Shinobugaoka no hotori Tora nyudou | 日本刀買取 販売、刀剣古美術の飯田高遠堂 (iidakoendo.com) 1 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted November 8, 2023 Report Posted November 8, 2023 9 hours ago, DoTanuki yokai said: It’s inlaid and filed on surface level with the Nakago, what is normal. the picture shows that some of the inlay fell out Dang, you're right Christian! 1 Quote
Mikaveli Posted December 7, 2023 Report Posted December 7, 2023 On 11/7/2023 at 1:06 PM, wakiboy said: Aside from the gold paint marker, the inscription doesn't appear to have been written by a native speaker of Japanese (or any country with Kanji). When a westerner copies a character like 山 they tend to see 4 lines, and draw 4 lines. Without knowing the typical number of strokes used, the result is far from convincing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.