Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you very much for sharing. The blade is remarkable and a fun study; I really enjoy the hada. The menuki, F/K, are a nice compliment.

 

I am a newer collector (just a few years into the hobby) and wondering given the time period, how big of a deal is it to collectors if the thickness is .76 CM. I have a blade from the same era with these measurements. Thank you in advance and apologize for the digression.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 11/5/2023 at 4:26 PM, ckaiserca said:

The first generation was active in the mid-Nanbokucho period from Bunna (1352) onwards, the second generation in the late Nanbokucho period from Shitoku (1384) onwards, the third generation in the Oei period of the Muromachi era from Oei (1394) onwards, and the fourth generation in the Kajō period of the Muromachi era from Kajō (1441) onwards. Their styles include those reminiscent of Mino swords and those incorporating the Soshu style.

Genuinely nice Japanese sword thank you so much for sharing your detailed write-up about it. One minor suggestion in the quoted text above. I have observed that in English writings about Japanese history, the Muromachi is referred to as a historical period and much shorter Oei as a historical era within the much larger historical period. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...