yf222000 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 Hello. I was wondering if your expertise could help me understand a bit more about this piece I have. The nakago says "Dewa Kuni Gassan Mune Mitsu" There are clues on the blade that indicates the traits of Yamamoto tradition. The hamon is Suguha and about 3 inches from the nakago, it has this on the hamon, which indicates work from Mino. I have looked everywhere, but i could not find any info on the signature at all. I really hope all of you gents could help. Thanks. Neil. Quote
outlier48 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 Neil - Not quite sure what you mean by "...understand a bit more..." - how 'bout pics of the nakago, kissaki, yokote and the entire blade, pehaps with a detailed description and some of the critical dimensions so there is something to go on? Charlie Brashear Quote
yf222000 Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Posted September 30, 2009 Hi. Sorry, i suck big time at photography and very new to Nihonto too, so bear with me. Here are the dimensions of the blade. There are no stamp of any type. Length: 26 Sugata: Shinogi-Zukuri Sori:Torii zori Kissaki: Chu Kissaki Hada: Masame Hamon: Chu Suguha Boshi: Kaeri Fukashi Mune: Mune-Takashi Nakago: Futsu Gata Yasurime: Kesho Yasuri Please excuse my not too good of the picture. Somehow, I just cant load more than one picture this time.. I would love to find out a little bit about this blade if any info is available. Doesn't seem to be the WW2 junk so far. Thanks again for the help gentlemen. Quote
Jean Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 Neil, Easier to enter your signature in your profile You wrote : Quote Length: 26Sugata: Shinogi-Zukuri Sori:Torii zori Kissaki: Chu Kissaki Hada: Masame Hamon: Chu Suguha Boshi: Kaeri Fukashi Mune: Mune-Takashi Nakago: Futsu Gata Yasurime: Kesho Yasuri For someone new to Nihonto, and by the blade description you gave, you certainly learn faster than most newbies I am a bit puzzled by the hada description Are you sure it is masame? pure masame is seldom encountered in Yamato tradition, if Gassan isn't it ayasugi? Except for Sendai school, Hosho school, pure masame is not frequently found Quote
Jacques Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 Hi, There are some who worked in pure masame during the Shinshinto era, such Gassan Sadakazu or Saito Kiyondo for example. However Masame does not lead towards Mino. Quote
pcfarrar Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 I'm not certain its masame looks more like ko-itame Quote
John A Stuart Posted September 30, 2009 Report Posted September 30, 2009 This sword looks to have been rubbed hard with a low grade uchiko to bring out the hada since the polish is old. What appears masame look like scratches. I am not sure of itame, but, an itame/mokume hada seems possible when I squint hard enough. I surely can't see an ayasugi hada, although that is not definitive. This one may best be seen in hand due to condition issues. A look at the mei would be interesting. Backwards, I know. John Quote
yf222000 Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Posted September 30, 2009 Hello. Well, the polish is not really that bad of a quality. However, since this is a study piece for me, so i won't spend too much money on it yet. Thank you for the compliment Jean. I am a newbie at this. I just spend a while and referred all the details and physical characteristic of the blade to the connoisseur's book of Japanese swords by Kokan Nagayama. I know it is extremely difficult to see the jihada. To the very limited knowledge and untrained eyes of mine, it seems like Masame. When i look at it with the light shines at the Ji, the hada looks like thousands of straight lines running from the nakago all the way to the yokote. I was just hoping to understand a little more about the maker of this. Can't seem to be able to find anything about it. I had it looked at by a Japanese gentleman here and he says that it may be made sometime in the late 1800 to 1900. No way to know or to confirm that. I just really hope that it is not the WW2 junk that was stamped out of cheap steel for the war effort. Thank you for any and all the help gentlemen. Quote
Toryu2020 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Posted October 1, 2009 I for one am curious to see the nakago, The Meikan lists only one Gassan Munemitsu and he worked in the Tenbun era, Doesn't mean some great grandson did not take the name in Showa. Don't see anything wrong with your hamon, a fuchi does not always mean Mino and if I am not mistaken masame is the baseline hada that produces ayasugi so strong masame in the shinogi-ji would not necessarily be outside the possibilities. What does the connoiseuers (sp?) book have to say about Sue-koto Gassan? I believe there is a small section on "other" schools... -tom Quote
yf222000 Posted October 1, 2009 Author Report Posted October 1, 2009 Hi Tom. Here's the pic for the nakago. Hope it is clear enough. Thanks. Quote
pcfarrar Posted October 1, 2009 Report Posted October 1, 2009 Dewa kuni Gassan Munemitsu is a showa period smith. I don't believe he had any relationship to the Gassan school. Quote
Nobody Posted October 1, 2009 Report Posted October 1, 2009 From Showa Oshigata Database: Ref. http://home.earthlink.net/~ttstein/munemit3.jpg Quote
Toryu2020 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Posted October 1, 2009 pcfarrar said: Dewa kuni Gassan Munemitsu is a showa period smith. I don't believe he had any relationship to the Gassan school. Thats pretty clear from the nakago, one limitation of the Meikan there are few Showa smiths, obviously there was a revival of the earlier name as so often happened, I would have said a foreigner or a forger cut this mei if Moriyama san had not posted the link to another mei by this guy, very rough stuff... -tom Quote
yf222000 Posted October 2, 2009 Author Report Posted October 2, 2009 Hello. Thank you for all of the help gentleman. Now that i know the blade was made by some unknown person. At least it does not seems to be the mass made swords that flooded the county during the war. Quote
David Flynn Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 (Yuki) MUNEMITSU, page 119 John Slough's book. Though it is signed the same, some characters and the shape of the nakago don't match. However, saying that, some smiths had more than one person signing their signature for them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.