Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an unsigned wakizashi. It is in excellent shape. No chips old polish. Ready for full restoration. A friend is willing to trade  for a wakizashi that is signed but in lesser shape. I’m inclined to pass but I’m curious about the signature. It was reported to have been a war souvenir. Amy thoughts on the signature?

FF8426DD-6E70-46B4-A32A-C95928F65FF0.jpeg

Posted

Hi Mark,

Two things that stand out IMO:

1) The area of the mei seems to have a different (lesser) amount of corrosion than the rest of the nakago, being a symptom that it might have been done at a later time after the original forging and polishing.

2) The mei itself is sloppily done.  A true mei done with expertise by the smith would typically look a lot smoother and without sign of hesitation, ie strokes changing direction slightly where they should be fluid.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...