Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

At this stage you may as well compare Moe, Larry and Curly to that guy.....

Yeah kind of running out of leads at this point,but not giving up yet.....oh by the way what does PNS stand for ? Pianist?

  • Haha 1
Posted

Interesting the nakago length on Toyosuke #34 and #45 are just shy of 9 inches or 226 mm very consistent in appearance,koshirai. Only difference is #34 has a 1 piece army style fuchi, and #45 has 2 seppa with a navy style fuchi. Posted #33 and 34 to compare to #45

 

s-l960.webp

post-5159-0-52785100-1582551479_thumb.jpg

20230325_075145.thumb.jpg.f7069a5dbca129077aa0a7db1c16ef80.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Probably a typo, but that is “56“. Do you have a link to the rest of the photos, are there more photos? Looking for the type of fittings and a look at the style of nakago jiri.  Also, the size of the anchor stamp.

 

Edit: disregard, I have that one in the chart posted by MarkC. It’s a blade only.  Of course, I am working on my phone and do not have the other photos. If this is a duplicate, and not posted by MarcC let me know.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Here we have the first time in 78 years two Toyosuke Swords are in the same place at the same time for comparison first compared total weights #34 @45.45 oz.

#45 @45.25 oz.

20230926_082646.jpg

20230926_082710.jpg

20230926_082855.jpg

20230926_082214.jpg

  • Love 1
  • Wow 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Jcstroud said:

#45 @45.25 oz.

Cool, John!  Noticeably different shapes.  Hey, from the photos available, I haven't been able to tell if the kabutogane on #45 is smooth all over or has textured bumps/dimpling.  Can you check for me?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

34 seems to have the Takayama to shape the kissaki is thick also over 6mm 5.3 being spec.both swords have kissaki thicknesses of over 6mm traits of  the 2nd design late war Takayama to

Posted

see now, the section you mentioned. We can see that they used the Takayama Forge blades at the school. It also shows that they were bought for active use by the Navy and Army. So, widely used, to include the school.  

Hey @Bruce Pennington

Just occured to me a possible explaination of the correlation of the swordsmith names to the intended recipients:could it be that Toyosuke blades were intended for army cadets at Toyama and Takeyasu blades were intended for Takayama naval cadets ?and both have the same crosshatch file pattern and small 4mm anchor stamp,and suriage nakago.now this is mere conjecture I know.hmmm

Posted
12 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Theories can give us something to investigate.  Just got to dig around for evidence!

I dont mind digging but I aint no Tombraider. 😁

  • Thanks 1
Posted

A correction to my previous post Toyosuke #45 has the bare blade weight of 812 grams and#34 has the bare blade weight of 802 grams or 1.79 lbs. Versus 1.76 lbs also thought I would add a couple of interesting photos

20230928_081100.jpg

20230928_080551.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Hm. Roman numerals on the habaki. Wonder if this could’ve been a war surplus blade. Trying to remember if I’ve seen Roman numerals on any of the postwar souvenirs.

#34 and 45  both have like numbered habaki,saya,koiguchi,fuchi,tsuba, and tsuka all matching numbers.

Posted
2 hours ago, John C said:

All of the parts on my #66 are marked; the habaki with roman numerals and the tsuka with Japanese numbers.

Very likely originated from seki then finished at Tenshozan Tanrenjo imo 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Initial comparisons:

#34  25 inches habaki to tip  or 63.5cm

#45  24.8125  habaki to tip or 63.023 cm

#34 assembled weight less saya =37.45 oz.or

2 pounds 5.45 oz.

#45 assembled weight

less saya =37.85 oz. or

2 pounds 5.85 oz.

This seems to show them to be short and overweight as compared to RJT specs even with the shortened nakago.

Hmmmm seems  the IJN had different specs especially Takayama blades.Could these be from there?

 

Posted

Iwas curious to know what the measurements were of the sword Takayama Masakichi used using the photos was able to estimate a sword of 2.1 shaku based on the nakago length of 1 shaku of course it is an estimate but interesting none the less. 😁

Posted

Well, you got me curious about the Roman numeral markings and I checked my souvenir, which is painted 50.  Sure enough:

 

unnamed.thumb.jpg.1e4be91214bc0d89f4c84486f768f6cf.jpgunnamed(1).thumb.jpg.dce14e993c79677eb79e4e853a47ee2c.jpg

 

Don't know why, but I did not expect the post-war operation to use the style.  Makes sense, though.  If they really want to mark ALL the parts with matching numbers, then the Roman marks are the best way to mark a habaki.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Seems to confirm that the koshirai  of both were done at Tenshozan Tanrenjo now the blade sources very likely Seki but not yet verified.....It is now my belief that Toyosuke was a swordsmith at the Takayama forge based on all the info and comparisons thus far....

Posted
On 9/29/2023 at 12:17 AM, Jcstroud said:

#34 and 45  both have like numbered habaki,saya,koiguchi,fuchi,tsuba, and tsuka all matching numbers.

John

Do you have a photo that includes all the stamped numbers, painted numbers, and Roman numerals together?

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...