Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello:

I would like to ask for your opinions on these parts. I do not have enough experience looking at these to say for sure. My suspicions are these are all reproductions, however I would appreciate everyone's take on them.

The ashi has flower stamen that are not staggered.

The tsuba just looks like a rough casting and too shallow (it varies from 6.03 to 6.98mm in thickness).

Thank you for taking a look.

John C.

ashi.png

tsuba.png

Posted
13 hours ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

All original. 

John:

Thank you for the response. These came off of a mantetsu I just picked up, which I know has a rewrapped tsuka and reproduction menuki so I started to question the other parts as well. The Ashi hanger bothered me particularly as it doesn't look like others I had seen.

John C. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

They do vary some.

Agreed. I too remember a discussion but I couldn't find it. F&G shows some variation, however they are line drawings and not much use.

John C.

Posted
5 hours ago, John C said:

John:

Thank you for the response. These came off of a mantetsu I just picked up, which I know has a rewrapped tsuka and reproduction menuki so I started to question the other parts as well. The Ashi hanger bothered me particularly as it doesn't look like others I had seen.

John C. 

John

Can you share the photos of the rest of your Mantetsu?

Posted
58 minutes ago, BANGBANGSAN said:

Can you share the photos of the rest of your Mantetsu

Sure. I can put them on the mantetsu thread. We have the serial number recorded already.

John C.

Posted

John:

I have seen the Manchurian version somewhere. But I think the kabutogane for this sword is a rewrapped replacement of a type 98. Note how the sword was originally sold in July 2022 at auction with a cord or cane wrap. Some time over the past 7 months before my purchase, it had been "refurbished." 

John C.

kabutogane.JPG

Screen Shot 2023-02-18 at 11.32.00 PM.png

Posted
2 hours ago, John C said:

But I think the kabutogane for this sword is a rewrapped replacement of a type 98.

 

Could it be the other way around?  In that the cord wrap was over the original fittings and protected them all these years.  Did you ask @mdiddy about this as he was the seller the second time around?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thomas is right, all the fittings are correct and the variation that I mentioned. The handle being rewrapped isn't a big deal, although whoever did the wrap delivered a very poor job with the finishing knot.

Posted
1 hour ago, Kiipu said:

seller the second time around?

I did. He was unaware of the change. He purchased the sword with the green ito wrap already applied. We actually discussed the sword at length. 

John C.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

Yes, that's the Kabutogane.

Okay. Now I see what you mean (I think). The way the ito is tied around the ishizuki?

John C.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Kiipu said:

In that the cord wrap was over the original fittings and protected them all these years.

Thomas:

This picture illustrates why I believe the tsuka has been rewrapped (or I suppose replaced). The section on the right is the original condition. You can see the same and cord wrap with exposed chuso. The section on the left is the way it is now with the green ito covering the same and the chuso.

John C. 

Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 11.04.53 PM.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

John C, thanks for the clarification.  I think the handle fitting are original but maybe a rewrap and replacement menuki? John (PNSSHOGUN) is correct about the ito wrap starting on the wrong side and this reinforces the notion it is a rewrap done in the States.

 

Below is a link to another 29th series and the only other one that has the knot tied around the kabutogane.

Imperial Japanese Army Officer Sword JS23

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thomas:

Thank you for the link. I noticed the Ashi on that saya is the same design as mine as well.

33 minutes ago, Kiipu said:

a rewrap and replacement menuki

Would it be worth trying to get the tsuka rewrapped by a professional or just leave alone? I know Bruce has some references.

John C.

Posted

Just to add, the existing wrap is incorrect in that the crossovers of the ito all go in the same direction rather than alternating.  As well as the other stuff.:)

 

All the best.

  • Like 2
Posted

Yes. They are the exact same one. The masking tape on the saya and the scratches on the blade match up perfectly. That's how I noticed the cord wrap to begin with.

8 minutes ago, Kiipu said:

That picture is similar to a Mantetsu sword discussed over at WRF.

John C.

  • Thanks 1
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...