Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone:

I have some questions about this Kanehide gendaito you all might be able to answer.

1. Do you think the mounts are original to the blade? I ask because there is no makugi-ana near the bottom of the nakago.

2. Why would there be two sets of painted assembly numbers? Is that related to possible changing the koshirae?

3. The blade is star stamped with two small seki stamps (one in the date and one on the mune). The stamps are correct, however, seki and not NA stamp? Is that common?

Thank you,

John C.

IMG_0263.JPG

kanehide blade.jpeg

Posted

3 of the pictures shown in this thread come from this Yakiba's page: https://yakiba.com/kanehide-nakata/.

 

If you look at the Yakiba's sword description, you'll see that the sword comes with a shirasaya, not a koshirae.

 

I'm a bit confused. Are those 6 pictures from the same sword ? I'd say no.

 

Even the paint on the nakago is different:

 

image.png.14066e815bdbee26c8c87af17f66f112.png

 

 

 

 

  • Wow 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

The yakiba blade and the one John posted are two different blades, both dated 1944.  I have them both on file.  The use of the small Na stamp was dominant in 1943, but was tapering off in '44 and a few are seen.  The small Seki became dominant in 1944/45, with a few seen in '43.  So there was overlap in '44 of both stamps.  

 

John, I have seen several blades with double painted numbers, some of them, like this, with double ana.  To me, this speaks to the idea the blade was re-mounted at some point, but we can only speculate.

 

Yakiba blade:

Kanehide_Date.thumb.jpg.45802ffad532fe8e95c3e3261314ce5f.jpgKanehide_Mei.thumb.jpg.269282e289cd63b0d28604f74a825868.jpgKanehide_Act_14.thumb.jpg.32696a98d95af754c4fe2bed0517692b.jpg

 

 

Kanehide_FVU.thumb.jpg.5f653b70a151040607f5ce9018221f56.jpgKanehide_Shirasaya.thumb.jpg.f5a20d21ca073551ce2c053841738237.jpg

 

Even the yakiba blade was double numbered:

 

Kanehide_Arsenal-mark1.jpg.b93b94c56068aec9679517598d2fa46d.jpgKanehide_Arsenal-mark2.jpg.b08995e6ed614a3720bd812823439b93.jpg

 

I don't have close shots of the blade John posted.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, francois2605 said:

I'm a bit confused. Are those 6 pictures from the same sword ? I'd say no.

Francois:

I see what you mean. I will try to take close ups of my blade and post them for comparison. But I do not have very good cameras.

Posted
7 hours ago, francois2605 said:

3 of the pictures shown in this thread come from this Yakiba's page

Francois:

You are correct! After looking at the sword in detail, the seller used pictures of the actual sword and "augmented" the listing with pictures of the Yakiba sword! Attached are pics of my sword in hand. 

Everyone please comment on this sword. My feeling is the sword and mei are correct, however what the seller did bothers me.

John C.

activity.JPG

Ashi.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Posted

1. Maybe. If it fits well then definitely. Hard to mix and match blades and saya.

2. Don’t know, not something that’d interest me anyways. 
3. Kanehide was a seki smith and many of the ones I’ve owned and seen throughout the years had small seki stamp in addition the to the star stamp. 
 

always liked the Kanehide blades I’ve seen, minus they were usually shorter. I’d still have one if the nagasa were >= 27”. 

Posted
15 hours ago, John C said:

2. Why would there be two sets of painted assembly numbers? Is that related to possible changing the koshirae?

 

Star stamped swords from Gifu Prefecture usually have two sets of painted numbers on them.  As far as I can tell, one is the Nagoya Arsenal production number and the other is the koshirae subassembly number?  Regardless of one's personal opinion, there does seem to be a pattern to these painted Nagoya RJT blades.  The colors noted so far are red, green, and blue.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Kiipu said:

The colors noted so far are red, green, and blue.

Thank you Thomas. Mine uses the green and blue paint. In addition, the blue is written using the letter A with Japanese numbers on the mei side and Arabic numerals on the date side. Malcom Cox has a Kanehide with the same style of blue numbering. So I guess the numbering is valid, at least.

John C.

Posted
9 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

To me, this speaks to the idea the blade was re-mounted

Bruce:

I concur. The blade does not have the second mekugi-ana near the base of the nakago, as would be typical with Rinji mounts. In addition, the scabbard is black lacquered wood and the tsuka has only one chuso button. And oddly, the ito was white (now filthy with dirt and mud) and not lacquered. So would it have originally been a type 98 mounting?

John C.

Posted

If the tsuka had no second hole i would not be afraid that the koshirae wasn't made for the sword. Maybe the first order was type 98 and was changed to type 3?

Usually the type3 had 2 mekugi ana. 

 

I like the sword.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, John C said:

The blade does not have the second mekugi-ana near the base of the nakago, as would be typical with Rinji mounts.

 

The shinobi ana 忍び孔 was frequently added by the fitting shop and not by the swordsmith.  It is not unusual to see Type 100 blades with only the mekugi ana 目釘穴.  There was a Type 100 which had a shinobi ana drilled right through the Tōkyō 1st Arsenal serial number.  This would imply that the serial number was stamped before the hole was drilled.  There are no hard and fast rules when it comes to Japanese military swords.

Shinobi Ana 忍び孔

  • Like 2
Posted
18 hours ago, John C said:

the same style of blue numbering

SEKI RJT ( star stamped) gendaito have often those big painted assembly numbers on the nakago, quite typical. 

 

One should not remove the paint though I agree it is not always pleasant to look at.

Posted

Sometimes old blades have rests of paintings too on the nakago. I think it was a common practice in all times to mark the swords for the makers of the koshirae.

Posted

Thomas, Bruno, and Chris:

Thank you all for the info. I thought it was interesting that the English letter A was used along with Japanese 930 on the mei side and Arabic 930 on the date side. Could they have been using parts (or their bins) from Western manufacturers?

 

John C.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...