Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It wouldn't be the first time, but I am wondering if I am wrong on a translation. I read this as Kanetoshi - as the picture name indicates. Am I wrong? Kanenami? Thanks for the help!

 

post-1404-1419676293794_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hi!Besides the fact that there is no Kanenami,i do believe that the Mei reads Kanetoshi.It may be from one of the Showato guys from Gifu (former Mino)

KAN 2637 (no signature to be found in my books) or KAN 2638.

The 3rd one,KAN 2632,has a different Mei.From KAN 2638 I could only

find a Nakarishi-Mei (look at Dr.Stein's site),where a specialist made the Mei for that Kanetoshi (and several other swordsmiths like the one of one of my swords).Ludolf

Posted

I have been looking a lot at the Kanetoshi meis that are online and in my reference manuals (specifically Fuller and Gregory's "Swordsmiths of Japan 1926 - 1945") and this looks A LOT like the oshigata I have found on Kumazawa Kanetoshi. I don't mean to doubt Koichi - because you have helped me a lot - but is it possible that this is Kanetoshi? Loiner, can you post a photo of your mei to see how close/far off this is?

Posted
I have been looking a lot at the Kanetoshi meis that are online and in my reference manuals (specifically Fuller and Gregory's "Swordsmiths of Japan 1926 - 1945") and this looks A LOT like the oshigata I have found on Kumazawa Kanetoshi. I don't mean to doubt Koichi - because you have helped me a lot - but is it possible that this is Kanetoshi? Loiner, can you post a photo of your mei to see how close/far off this is?

hi.

as far as i know this smith used nijimei as my mei is the long version.....here is mine

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5522

Posted

After viewing the "Kanetoshi" link posted by Steve, I am pretty positive that my mei is the same. One reason is the "Rockwell" test - although it may of shoots the theory posted about an army engineer making the stamps. My blade has the same stamps.

 

 

Does anyone have any thoughts on what this would be? Seems to be a pretty off chance that the same "test" was conducted on a blade by the same smith. I have also looked in all of my references and scanned the internet for anything by Kanenami. Is it possible that this could be another smith's mei - Like Yasunori also signed Takenori? Thanks everyone for the great discussion and Koichi, I certainly didn't mean any disrespect. I sincerly appreciate all of the help you have given me when I run up against the wall and even in this case when I think I get it right...

post-1404-141967630444_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hi Koichi,I am quite astonished about what you are telling us with the Sosho writing,which this swordsmith didn't use.I believe that you are not accepting,that there is no Kanenami Showato but 3 Kanetoshi from Gifu.What about the left part of the last Kanji he used,which differs from the one of your "nami".The writing of "toshi" maybe his personal style.Ludolf

Posted

Except, Ludolf....that Moriyama san has already shown us 3 examples earlier in this thread of the smith Kanenami from WW2.

And the sosho shows us which strokes might be abbreviated when writing the stylized kanji. You can clearly see it in the sosho, even though he didn't sign in sosho....it is like the cursive script for kanji.

Yes..after seeing that I can quite easily see how it would be Kanenami. Thanks for the clear demonstration Koichi

 

 

Brian

Posted

I hope someone can come up with a definitive pic of a similar mei because I can see where "if " it was written in a "cursive" soshu style it could be Kanemani - BUT its not. Its like looking at a photograph but if it the same thing looked like a PIcasso it would look like something else - of course it would, but would it be identifiable as the first or the second ? :dunno:

Posted

:rotfl: I am losing it I think - Had a look in George Trotters book and there is a Kanetoshi and a Kanemani. Sort of light pictures but here they are - fill your boots! The Kanemani is a Naval Gunto, made in the 40's the Kanetoshi, a 1943 tachi in gunto mts. EDIT: I added the original "KAnetoshi Mei 1 photo that started this topic and if you compare them all Koichi is correct as the Kanemani from Trotters book although a little rough is the same. I guess the Kanetoshi Mei 1 is actually Kanemani.

 

 

 

 

 

post-539-14196763103512_thumb.jpg

post-539-14196763109787_thumb.jpg

post-539-1419676313007_thumb.jpg

Posted

I have been sold for a while, but my Kanenami is in naval mounts. Not a lock tight conclusion, but another indication that Koichi was correct and I should know better than to ask, "Are you sure?"

Posted

What's the conclusion?Is he now regarded as a hitherto non recorded Showa swordsmith,because a Kanenami is not listed in the following sources?Ludolf

Hawley

Tokuno

Gendai Toko Meikan

Gendai Toko Kinko Shitsu Kata Soran

A Guide to Showa Swordsmiths 1926-Present

An Oshigata Book of Modern Japanese Swordsmiths 1868-1945

Dr.Stein/Oshigata of Showa Era Swordsmiths

Swords and Swordsmiths of the Gendaito Period 1868-1989

Undocumented Showa Era Swordsmiths

Modern Japanese Swords and Swordsmiths From 1868 to the Present

Nihonto Club Swordsmiths Database

Posted

Whomever sneered at George Turner for interest in MIlitary blades can ask him as the two photos I posted came from his book! :) Or we could hope he is reading again and may get in on this!

Posted
What's the conclusion?Is he now regarded as a hitherto non recorded Showa swordsmith,because a Kanenami is not listed in the following sources?

 

I would say, YES

 

I found another Kanenami on bidders:

http://www.bidders.co.jp/item/122357332

 

If he is recorded or not does not matter. There is "Kanenami" written on the tang, and that´s that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...