Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Dave, the blade looks overall well made. However the large and deep Hi looks to have been used to remove a large flaw. A shame as it hasn't been done well and detracts from an otherwise good looking Tanto.

  • Like 3
Posted

My guess would be shinto, certainly no earlier than Momoyama, but probably shinto. Not the most typical shape for the period, but you see them now and then.

Very broad on the school. One can say something like "Owari" but it does not matter that much.

Unfortunately with such information its all guesswork.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 

 

2 hours ago, Rivkin said:

My guess would be shinto, certainly no earlier than Momoyama, but probably shinto. Not the most typical shape for the period, but you see them now and then.

Very broad on the school. One can say something like "Owari" but it does not matter that much.

Unfortunately with such information its all guesswork.

I would like to know what leads you to such conclusions

Posted

I’ll stick my head above the parapet! 
don’t  think a Mei has been removed (if signed wouldn’t it have been on the other side anyway?)

looks classic late muromachi period wakizashi…..Mino or Bizen?

nice shape nakago, overall sugata is in my opinion attractive

shame about the poorer quality hi…….but that could be caused by bad polish

All the best. Colin

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...