blucool Posted November 24, 2006 Report Posted November 24, 2006 I've read that a large percentage of blades crafted during the Showa era were oil quenched as opposed to the traditional water quenching. Is there a way to tell the difference between oil and water quenched blades just by appearance alone? Also, why is an oil quenched sword considered less desirable than a water quenched blade, all other things considered equal. Thanks! Quote
QuangD Posted November 25, 2006 Report Posted November 25, 2006 Blucool, oil is cooling the blade slowly rate so the chance of steel cracking is more less. With water, cooling down the blade at a faster rate so the chance of having a crack in the temperline is higher. With the high demand of swords during the WWII, some smiths will use oil to temperline the blade to meet demand. As a collector, people prefer to collect water temperline sword as to oil temperline. Quote
Grey Doffin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Posted November 25, 2006 My understanding of the difference between water and oil quenched blades is that the oil quench leaves a very uninteresting, sleepy hamon and no possibility of ji-nie. A well made oil quench blade should look like a very poorly made water quench. Grey Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.