Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, 

I was surfing through the market of flebay and noticed something somewhat odd. There was a type 44 mounted gunto containing a 1942 date on the mei. This makes me wonder if type 44 mounts were made before 1944? Otherwise if the sword is fake overall, it's pretty convincing! Just wanted to get an input from you guys so I can maybe learn something out of this!

Screenshot_20211112-184613_eBay.jpg

Posted
  On 11/13/2021 at 3:15 AM, sword_guy said:

I am still fairly new but have never heard of type 44 gunto.

 

I have seen Type 94 Guntos which as far as I know started production in 1932 (http://ohmura-study.net/931.html)

As far as I know shin Gunto were produced all throughout and before the war so a sword produced in 1942 is very reasonable.

Expand  

I'm a little new as well 😅 The nomenclature is a little erroneous, Type 44, type 3 mounts. Not entirely sure what the official model of these style mounts were called. 

Posted

Interesting. I see some references to type 44 online but as far as I know the type naming system comes from the year of the emperor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_98) so type 44 would be 1911 (as per the type 44 rifle) if I understand correctly.

As I said a bit new and I do see the type 3 on ohmura http://ohmura-study.net/952.html

 

I also know that many swords were made not necessarily at the same time or place as they were later put together. Perhaps it was a blade that was part of a Type 98 and then refit into a Type 3 housing?

Do you have more pictures of the blade?

Posted
  On 11/13/2021 at 3:15 AM, sword_guy said:

I am still fairly new but have never heard of type 44 gunto.

 

I have seen Type 94 Guntos which as far as I know started production in 1932 (http://ohmura-study.net/931.html)

As far as I know shin Gunto were produced all throughout and before the war so a sword produced in 1942 is very reasonable.

Expand  

Hi Robert, the Type 94 was officially established in 1934.

 

The 'Type 44' is an erroneous name for the Type 3 or Type Rinji Seshiki which was established in the early 40's. This thread has all the information you will need:

 

  • Like 2
  • Love 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 11/13/2021 at 3:30 AM, PNSSHOGUN said:

Hi Robert, the Type 94 was officially established in 1934.

 

The 'Type 44' is an erroneous name for the the Type 3 or Type Rinji Seshiki which was established in the early 40's. This thread has all the information you will need:

 

Expand  

You are absolutely right thank you for the correction!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...