PegasusArms Posted June 15, 2021 Report Posted June 15, 2021 Hi all, came across this sword...for decades, I thought I had seen pretty much all Japanese colonial swords for decades, but I have never seen an emblem like this one has. The emblem or mon is surely not from the Formosa/Taiwan, Chosen/Korea, or Nanyo/South Sea Japanese colonial government. Anyone can help identifying this emblem? This must be pretty rare? Help a man learn something new? Much appreciate! Quote
drb 1643 Posted June 15, 2021 Report Posted June 15, 2021 This is a rare Tsingtao sonin level colonial sword! Tom 3 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted June 15, 2021 Report Posted June 15, 2021 Tom nailed it! I learned something today, too! Dawson pages: 2 1 Quote
Dave R Posted June 15, 2021 Report Posted June 15, 2021 Does a damn good German style beer, no one wanted to close down the German founded brewery and it still runs today. Sometimes governments get it right! 1 Quote
Jon MB Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 On 6/16/2021 at 5:57 AM, lonely panet said: The saya is mis matched. Respectfully, I had a Nan'yo example and people said the same thing. Not sure I agree. Quote
lonely panet Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question if a type 32 ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct. get my notion Quote
Jon MB Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 50 minutes ago, lonely panet said: so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question if a type 32 ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct. get my notion Charmingly put, minus the punctuation. So let's hear your assumptions regarding the mismatch. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 Is it the floral pattern at the top of the saya, instead of a plain surface? Quote
Jon MB Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 It seems that if the 'heart' design on the fittings is not an exact match to Dawson's illustrations on these swords, some feel it must be incorrect. My own feeling is that like Gunto, there were minor variations in decorative features over time, (based on seeing a few examples in person). Quote
Jon MB Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 1 hour ago, lonely panet said: so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question if a type 32 ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct. get my notion Colonial officials' swords were probably not stored and refurbished in arsenals like other ranks' cavalry sabres, so swopping scabbards seems less likely. Quote
Kiipu Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 For a change of pace, lets look at the 1917 Tsingtao uniform regulations. 青島守備軍民政部職員服制ヲ定ム 青島 = Chintao = Tsingtao = Qingdao. 1 Quote
Jon MB Posted June 20, 2021 Report Posted June 20, 2021 Reference to the regulations will of course be interesting, but not conclusive, if regulations were not seriously enforced and manufacturers / retailers offered variations. As was the case with Kyu and Shin Gunto. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted June 21, 2021 Report Posted June 21, 2021 The kyu-gunto had great many variations. Either Fuller or Dawson (or both) mentioned this. Quote
drb 1643 Posted June 21, 2021 Report Posted June 21, 2021 Thanks Thomas for posting the regulations diagrams. The sonin level swords show a different scabbard fitting pattern i.e. Not a boars eye cutout. The sword pictured also has the correct sonin level colonial knot although it's damaged. In my humble opinion I believe the scabbard is correct. Tom 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.