Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 Hi all, came across this sword...for decades, I thought I had seen pretty much all Japanese colonial swords for decades, but I have never seen an emblem like this one has. The emblem or mon is surely not from the Formosa/Taiwan, Chosen/Korea, or Nanyo/South Sea Japanese colonial government. Anyone can help identifying this emblem? This must be pretty rare? Help a man learn something new? Much appreciate! 

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 6.jpg

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 4.jpg

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 5.jpg

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 3.jpg

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 1.jpg

Japanese Colonial Sword Unknown Emblem 10.jpg

Mon.PNG

Posted

 Does a damn good German style beer, no one wanted to close down the German founded brewery and it still runs today. Sometimes governments get it right!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/16/2021 at 5:57 AM, lonely panet said:

The saya is mis matched. 

Respectfully, I had a Nan'yo example and people said the same thing. Not sure I agree.

 

Posted

so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question

 

if a type 32  ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct.  get my notion 

Posted
50 minutes ago, lonely panet said:

so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question

 

if a type 32  ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct.  get my notion 

Charmingly put, minus the punctuation. So let's hear your assumptions regarding the mismatch.

 

 

Posted

It seems that if the 'heart' design on the fittings is not an exact match to Dawson's illustrations on these swords, some feel it must be incorrect. My own feeling is that like Gunto, there were minor variations in decorative features over time, (based on seeing a few examples in person). 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, lonely panet said:

so you had 1 example, and that allows you to form a informative opinion. question

 

if a type 32  ko saya fits a otsu but the numbers arnt matching is that correct??? its happened about 10,000 times but its not correct.  get my notion 

Colonial officials' swords were probably not stored and refurbished in arsenals like other ranks' cavalry sabres, so swopping scabbards seems less likely.

Posted

For a change of pace, lets look at the 1917 Tsingtao uniform regulations.

青島守備軍民政部職員服制ヲ定ム

青島 = Chintao = Tsingtao = Qingdao.

 

1917-chintao-f20-copy.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Reference to the regulations will of course be interesting, but not conclusive, if regulations were not seriously enforced and manufacturers / retailers offered variations. As was the case with Kyu and Shin Gunto.

 

Posted

Thanks Thomas for posting the regulations diagrams. The sonin level swords show a different scabbard fitting pattern i.e. Not a boars eye cutout. The sword pictured also has the correct sonin level colonial knot although it's damaged. In my humble opinion I believe the scabbard is correct.

Tom

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...