Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I'm curious about the Mei on this piece and was hoping, once again, that someone might be able to make a suggestion. Mei reads only "Yoshinobu" however the only Yoshinobu I can find any real info on is the Yoshinobu that was a student of Tadayoshi - a Hizen smith and as I understand it (with my very limited knowledge) this blade is in a Mino style. I realise the chances that this is Gimei but still I wanted to ask for any thoughts anyone might have. Again please forgive any ignorance but suggestions are very welcome. Thanks.

 

Adam.

Posted

Curious indeed, this looks to be a Shinshinto period copy of an early Koto Mino Kanemoto, possibly signed by a Shinto Yamashiro Settsu smith no less, with a Bizen looking nakago jiri :phew: . Wow, this blade represents more than half the gokaden over multi historical periods in one sword. :clap:

Posted

Hi,

I cannot find a Mino smith with the name ,but Bizen and Yamashiro are listed.

If i had to hazard a guess based on the image i would say that the Nakago looks later than 1750.

The latest i can find is a yamashiro smith from 1688 but having a blade from that period and school i cannot see that yours appears as old based on Nakago.

It is also worth noting that none of the later smiths signed with just 2 characters.

I would guess that this is a gimei (IMHO) of the much earlier Bizen smith who did sign Yoshi-nobu. one in 1293 and another 1362 and again in 1394 as they were JO JO saku.

its just a guess though

i am sure people more knowledgable will help you further.

regards

shan

Posted

My guess is either Shin-Shinto or later, or the business end of something that was broken at or above the machi and remade into a short wakizashi. If the latter, no idea why the signature unless it was added to increase the value.

Grey

Posted

Thanks to those who have made suggestions so far. The seller (who has been given a favorable mention - including by yourself actually Hybridfiat just a couple of weeks ago) seemed pretty sure about it - (excluding mei of course but including the age - but I guess who can be sure?). Actually though he did say if there were problems then he'd be ok to take it back. I admit I'm a sucker for openness but he seemed very genuine. Again though, thanks for the input.

 

Does it seem possible that an old blade was more recently cut down?

Posted

Adam,

I can't verify if this is earlier than a Shinshinto or not, but I can say that if it is post 1750 or so, that certainly doesn't pose a problem for the sword in my eyes. Lots of nice shinshinto out there, and unless you are one that only wants early blades, there is nothing about it that would make me consider it a problem. Lots of shinshinto out there that are far better than mass produced Koto. If you like it, then enjoy it. Don't get too fixated on the age :)

 

Brian

Posted

Thanks Brian,

 

No, I'm not particularly concerned about age, I was just wondering. I like it regardless of how old it is, and I certainly think it should be better to have sth with quality more recently produced than a mass produced, low quality blade with greater age.

Adam

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...