ozymay Posted November 21, 2020 Report Posted November 21, 2020 Hello, My grandfather passed this year and I received this sword from him. I think it's a kanmuri-otoshi Shinshinto blade, is this correct? (Based off of information I got via Facebook) But I am wondering how I can tell from what period the sword is from. what do you think? The blade itself measures about 14 inches. Thanks -Ozymay (Jeff) Quote
vajo Posted November 21, 2020 Report Posted November 21, 2020 I think it is muromachi/ shinto period. Please give the sword some choiji oil für the fittings and the blade. Condition needs a lot of good care. I like the Tsuba + Fuchi/Kashira. 1 Quote
Grey Doffin Posted November 21, 2020 Report Posted November 21, 2020 Hi Jeff, Could be Shinshinto; could be Muromachi. Hard to tell from just these pictures. Cheers, Grey, also in Minnesota 1 Quote
ozymay Posted November 21, 2020 Author Report Posted November 21, 2020 13 minutes ago, vajo said: I think it is muromachi/ shinto period. Please give the sword some choiji oil für the fittings and the blade. Condition needs a lot of good care. I like the Tsuba + Fuchi/Kashira. Thank you! I just applied some Choiji oil after I took these photos. I am looking at cleaning up the Tsuba right now with ivory possibly. Thank you. Quote
ozymay Posted November 21, 2020 Author Report Posted November 21, 2020 13 minutes ago, Grey Doffin said: Hi Jeff, Could be Shinshinto; could be Muromachi. Hard to tell from just these pictures. Cheers, Grey, also in Minnesota What kind of other photos could help? I can see if I could take some. Thanks. Cheers to my Minnesota family. Quote
vajo Posted November 21, 2020 Report Posted November 21, 2020 Jeff don't clean it. And dont try to remove rust. This is a delicate work for an experienced collector. Iron needs years of care to get in better states of conditon. 2 Quote
ozymay Posted November 21, 2020 Author Report Posted November 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, vajo said: Jeff don't clean it. And dont try to remove rust. This is a delicate work for an experienced collector. Iron needs years of care to get in better state of conditon. That sounds good. Thanks for the input. Quote
vajo Posted November 21, 2020 Report Posted November 21, 2020 I would start with the blade. Remove the Habaki and looks under it. I would oil the blade slightly. After that use uchiko to remove the oil. your towel will be black from the dust on it. After that oil it new. For the Iron Fittings took a soft cotton with choji and oil all parts slightly. You must do this every week over a long time. Do not rub on the parts. 2 Quote
ozymay Posted November 21, 2020 Author Report Posted November 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, vajo said: I would start with the blade. Remove the Habaki and looks under it. I would oil the blade slightly. After that use uchiko to remove the oil. your towel will be black from the dust on it. After that oil it new. For the Iron Fittings took a soft cotton with choji and oil all parts slightly. You must do this every week over a long time. Do not rub on the parts. That is great information! Thank you, I will do my best. Quote
Grey Doffin Posted November 22, 2020 Report Posted November 22, 2020 Hi Jeff, Feel free to call with questions before you attempt any repair, or questions in general. Mean time, here is a care and handling brochure you should read: http://nbthk-ab.org/cleaning-maintenance.php Cheers, Grey 218-726-0395 1 Quote
Tom Darling Posted November 22, 2020 Report Posted November 22, 2020 Jeff, I am not sure if you have a shinogi (Ridge), it looks like hira-zukuri, flat on each side? and the mekuni-ana is quite old. Kindly take a better pic of the point area, and other side of blade. I would call it a ko-wakizashi at 14 inches with goma-bashi . The sword is very very interesting, and definitely have it polished, excellent candidate for shinsa. Take a couple more pic of the nakago without the habaki. It could be fat on one side. Cheers. Tom D. 1 Quote
Geraint Posted November 22, 2020 Report Posted November 22, 2020 Dear Jeff. When you say that the blade is 14" long is that overall including the tang? If so then what is the length from the tip to the notch at the back where the habaki sits? All the best. Quote
DoTanuki yokai Posted November 22, 2020 Report Posted November 22, 2020 Looking at the yasurime i would say edo. And for the shape i would say its unokubi zukuri with hira zukuri base. http://www.ksky.ne.jp/~sumie99/styles.html 1 Quote
ozymay Posted November 22, 2020 Author Report Posted November 22, 2020 12 hours ago, Tom Darling said: Jeff, I am not sure if you have a shinogi (Ridge), it looks like hira-zukuri, flat on each side? and the mekuni-ana is quite old. Kindly take a better pic of the point area, and other side of blade. I would call it a ko-wakizashi at 14 inches with goma-bashi . The sword is very very interesting, and definitely have it polished, excellent candidate for shinsa. Take a couple more pic of the nakago without the habaki. It could be fat on one side. Cheers. Tom D. Hi Tom, Thanks for the comment. It does look like Hira-zukuri to me. The total length if you count the tang is at 18 inches. I took some more photos for you. hope they help. Thank you! - Jeff Quote
ozymay Posted November 22, 2020 Author Report Posted November 22, 2020 11 hours ago, Geraint said: Dear Jeff. When you say that the blade is 14" long is that overall including the tang? If so then what is the length from the tip to the notch at the back where the habaki sits? All the best. The total length if you count the tang is 18 inches. Thanks for the comment -Jeff Quote
ozymay Posted November 22, 2020 Author Report Posted November 22, 2020 10 hours ago, DoTanuki yokai said: Looking at the yasurime i would say edo. And for the shape i would say its unokubi zukuri with hira zukuri base. http://www.ksky.ne.jp/~sumie99/styles.html Nice, Thanks for the reply! That website seems like a good resource. Quote
RichardP Posted November 22, 2020 Report Posted November 22, 2020 What’s going on here? Seems to appear on the other side of the blade as well... Quote
ozymay Posted November 23, 2020 Author Report Posted November 23, 2020 2 hours ago, RichardP said: What’s going on here? Seems to appear on the other side of the blade as well... That is just residue where the Habaki was. 1 Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted November 23, 2020 Report Posted November 23, 2020 Jeff, you have a lot of people throwing out bits & pieces, much of which requires explanation. My recommendation is to lightly oil the blade (everything except the nakago (tang). Then, do nothing until you contact Grey Doffin, who can walk you through the cleaning process. Remember that all of us are just caretakers of our Nihonto. 1 Quote
Tom Darling Posted November 23, 2020 Report Posted November 23, 2020 I would contribute the surface rubbing to the habaki, tight fit. Quote
Geraint Posted November 23, 2020 Report Posted November 23, 2020 Dear Jeff. Just to summarise what we have so far......... You have a nice sword, the length makes it a ko wakizashi or short wakiszashi. Swords between 12" and 24" are wakizashi. The sword is unsigned, (mu mei), but the yasurime, (file marks used by the smith to finish the tang), are clear. Generally, (and you will soon realise that nothing is absolute in this game), clear file marks suggest that the sword is slightly younger, in this case Shinto, (1600 - 1800) or Shinshinto, (1800 - 1860). Those dates are approximate. Given all your photogr[hs which make some things clearere than at the start, my suggestion would be that this is a Shinshinto sword. The koshirae, (mounting), is quite plain but attractive and generally complete, go very easy on the cleaning of the tsuba until you have taken up Ken's suggestion and met up with Gray who will be able to offer you good advice. Whatever the verdict you have a nice example of a genuine Japanese sword in full mounts, it is a nice thing and the family association with your Grandfather makes it special. Enjoy the journey as you learn more. All the best. 1 Quote
Tom Darling Posted November 24, 2020 Report Posted November 24, 2020 Jeff, I believe that your unokubi-zekuri blade was originally a Naginata, machi okuri, would explain the yasuri-me appearing fresher. The five notches on the tang, could have been a measurement where to raise the machi. The kassaki boshi was re-shaped, mekuni-ana is old, and chiseled nearer the nakago-jiri end of tang. Naginata began in the feudal times, it very possibly could be over 300 yrs old? Good luck. I like it a lot. Congratulations. Take care. IMHO. Quote
Geraint Posted November 24, 2020 Report Posted November 24, 2020 Dear Tom. Would you like to expand your thinking on that idea a bit? What sort of naginata did you have in mind? I would expect naginata naoshi to have evidence of a shinogi in the nakago and the blade, perhaps naginat hi also. As this sword is hira zukuri based none of these features are evident. If the shortening was so severe that all these signs were lost then I am surprised that the thinning of the mune is so short and does not continue into the rest of the blade. I am fairly sure that the marks on the nakago mune are not measurements for shortening, I think the consensus is that these are assembly marks. All the best. Quote
Tom Darling Posted November 24, 2020 Report Posted November 24, 2020 O-kay, I'll give it a crack in my humble way. It is an occurrence when two or more similar distinct patterns/styles of execution are found in a particular manner or technique on the blade. Also, notice two or three inches below kassaki shows a groove indicating what appears to be a shinogi. Naginata to ko-waki. Peace. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.