Oldman Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 Can anyone shed light on this iron tsuba, maker, school, age? It is 67 mm diameter. Thanks! Quote
Akitombo Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 Kinai school, Edo period . David Quote
Ford Hallam Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 As David wrote, Kinai, left side reads Kinai saku (made), right side Echizen (no) Ju or 'living in Echizen (province)' 1 Quote
mecox Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 Michael, yes this is Echizen Kinai very late design, but the mei looks a little "clunky" (quickly cut). On website Nihonto-no-Bi is a comprehensive summary of Kinai group for comparison http://www.users.on.net/~coxm/?page=TsubaIII Mal 1 Quote
mecox Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 Michael, I had a closer look, please check if this may be cast.....hit with a steel object...does it "ring" or "clunk"? Quote
SalaMarcos Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 Also seems cast, maybe not...but judging the mei and the pic... Hope not... Quote
b.hennick Posted November 15, 2020 Report Posted November 15, 2020 I do not see the usual obvious signs of a cast piece. Quote
Yasaka Azuma Posted November 16, 2020 Report Posted November 16, 2020 Last week I happened to see the same tsuba auctioned. https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/c865354537 Quote
Oldman Posted November 16, 2020 Author Report Posted November 16, 2020 Thanks very much all. While my tsuba certainly looks very similar to the one that was listing on Yahoo, the sekigane and tagane ato are different. I don't see any indicia of it having been cast; no porosity, no flashing. I'm reluctant to hit it with anything hard. Cheers, Michael S. Quote
Shugyosha Posted November 16, 2020 Report Posted November 16, 2020 Hi Michael, Go on - give it a whack with a hammer😄...but seriously, I agree with you, nothing there to indicate it's cast. More importantly, I think Ford would have mentioned it if there had been anything untoward to his expert eye. Quote
Spartancrest Posted November 16, 2020 Report Posted November 16, 2020 Michael, the Kinai 'school' was well known for its production of Aoi pattern guards, they were produced in some numbers and as usual in various states of quality. Yours shows no casting signs, but I would agree the Mei looks 'hasty'. A large number are from 'student' craftsmen who happily signed their work with the masters name. Yas's example only goes to prove the numbers made. Another two examples with the same signature.[sorry for the partial image] Another similar to yours [ura view] and an even more common version. [the right hand pattern are so common they are still being copied] One going on auction now as well. https://www.jauce.com/auction/s784060301 I hope the images are of some use for comparison. [As you noted the nakago-ana is the fingerprint and the tagane-ato are the clincher for individual guards.] Regards Dale. Quote
Yasaka Azuma Posted November 16, 2020 Report Posted November 16, 2020 I agree with Dale. The sixth generation Takahashi-Kinai was named in 1809 and died in 1821. The two Aoi leaf openwork tsuba are said to have been made by him. However, there are so many tsuba with Mei in the 6th generation that Japanese collectors call them "丁稚記内 (apprentice-kinai)" mass-produced by apprentices. They include foundry products and replicas of the new era, but if you follow the rules of kinai, they don't worry about the details. 1 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.