Aethel_berht Posted October 26, 2020 Report Posted October 26, 2020 So I picked up a Katana mounted in WWII Type 94 Koshirae, I got curious on the blade itself and I need help putting a rough date on the blade. It is a mumei, so unsigned. I'm sure the blade itself dates before WWII, it has the steel grain, Hada, and a Hamon line. Is there any way to date this? The Hamon is very difficult to see, I assume it was mistreated in the past. Sorry, this is my first post so m still fairly unfamiliar with the site. 2 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted October 26, 2020 Report Posted October 26, 2020 It looks to be quite old, perhaps 14th/15th century. For anything more informative we will need more detailed shots of the entire blade. Could you also please share some pictures of the Army mounts as well? 1 Quote
Aethel_berht Posted October 26, 2020 Author Report Posted October 26, 2020 3 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said: It looks to be quite old, perhaps 14th/15th century. For anything more informative we will need more detailed shots of the entire blade. Could you also please share some pictures of the Army mounts as well? Yeah sure! Here is some more photos. Quote
Aethel_berht Posted October 26, 2020 Author Report Posted October 26, 2020 Heres some extra pictures. Quote
Grey Doffin Posted October 26, 2020 Report Posted October 26, 2020 Hi A. Definitely an older blade but to know much about how old and from which group of swordsmiths it comes you'll have to track down someone who is knowledgeable and honest to take a look in hand for you. There is only so much that can be learned from photos. In case you're new to Nihonto (you don't say), here is a care and handling brochure you would be smart to read at least once. http://nbthk-ab.org/cleaning-maintenance.php Blade looks nice. Grey Quote
Aethel_berht Posted October 26, 2020 Author Report Posted October 26, 2020 Thanks, i'll definitely get it looked at. Quote
16k Posted October 26, 2020 Report Posted October 26, 2020 Looks like a Muromachi blade to me. Very nice! Quote
Aethel_berht Posted October 26, 2020 Author Report Posted October 26, 2020 Thanks for the help, I figured that the blade was shortened at one point considering the tang and the Machi Okuri. Quote
Eric M Posted October 27, 2020 Report Posted October 27, 2020 nice blade & mounting. what makes you think it is a 94 model? I would have thought it is more an early nice 98 Quote
Aethel_berht Posted October 27, 2020 Author Report Posted October 27, 2020 The guard makes me think its a type 94. Quote
16k Posted October 27, 2020 Report Posted October 27, 2020 And I think you are right! Type 94 guard. Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted October 28, 2020 Report Posted October 28, 2020 Would need better photos of the Tsuka and Tsuba to determine that. Quote
Utopianarian Posted November 1, 2020 Report Posted November 1, 2020 Kazu-uchi mono from Muromachi 1 Quote
16k Posted November 1, 2020 Report Posted November 1, 2020 1 hour ago, Utopianarian said: Kazu-uchi mono from Muromachi Interesting! I've always wondered how people make the difference as I’ve never seen an actual one. Can you please elaborate? Quote
Utopianarian Posted November 2, 2020 Report Posted November 2, 2020 Rough masame hada is definitely a big indicator for kazu-uchi mono due to the poor quality steel. I own a few. Here is pic of one next to a zoomed in pic of the sword featured in this discussion. Sue Bizen= kazu-uchi mono 1 Quote
16k Posted November 2, 2020 Report Posted November 2, 2020 Thanks, I learned something new today. Quote
Utopianarian Posted November 2, 2020 Report Posted November 2, 2020 I am taking in as much as I can as well. Still learning always 1 Quote
ChrisW Posted November 2, 2020 Report Posted November 2, 2020 Interesting, add that to the list of things I did not know! (its a very long list.. the more I learn, the less I know.) 1 Quote
Jean Posted November 3, 2020 Report Posted November 3, 2020 In fact, concerning sue Bizen Kazu Uchi Mono, they are forged in Bizen style, pure masame is not sue Bizen style. From time to time, they are for sale on Aoi Art website, check the description, generally the hada is a mix of mokume and itame. Masame hada is very difficult to forge. Very good masame (no flaws) hada is very expensive and sought after. Due to the fact that all layers are folded in the same direction they are very difficult to solder, thus some collectors consider that longitudinal opening in this case are inherent to masame and not considered as kizu. The longer the blade the harder good masame is difficult to obtain. 2 Quote
Utopianarian Posted November 4, 2020 Report Posted November 4, 2020 Yes, particularly Yamato Hosho school which are known for masame hada. Ware is acceptable to a certain point (masa-ware) and an important kantei point. But even Hosho was in many cases not 100% masame hada. I know there are many other factors to take into account. Quote
Gakusee Posted November 4, 2020 Report Posted November 4, 2020 Bizen Kaziuchimono do not need to have or even attempt to make masame. It could be larger grained itame nagare too. What of course you guys are right about is the generally low quality and openings in the jihada. The masame in shinogiji is a different indicator of the Muromachi blade and if combined with low quality nagare (some people sometimes mistake nagare for masame) or coarseness, we can probably then identify mass produced blades. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.